论文标题
热热层间介质中的X射线吸收线:用骆驼模拟进行探测Chandra观察
X-ray Absorption Lines in the Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium: Probing Chandra observations with the CAMEL simulations
论文作者
论文摘要
被称为“丢失的重子问题”,当地宇宙中约有三分之一的重子仍未得到理解。丢失的重子被认为存在于宇宙网丝丝的热热层间介质(WHIM)中,这些媒体丝质丝的检测很具有挑战性。 Chandra X射线的最新观察结果使用了一种新颖的堆叠分析,并检测到OVII吸收线朝向发光的类星体的视线,暗示失踪的Baryons可能位于一时兴起。为了探索OVII吸收系的特性如何取决于反馈物理,我们将观察结果与从宇宙学和天体物理学获得的预测与机器学习(CAMEL)仿真套件进行了比较。骆驼由带有最先进的超新星(SN)和活跃的银河核(AGN)反馈模型的宇宙学仿真组成,并具有不同强度的宇宙模拟模拟。我们发现,在星系的郊区,模拟的OVII色谱柱密度高于大规模的WIM,但对于所有反馈运行,它们始终低于Chandra观察结果中获得的ovii柱密度。我们确定OVII分布主要对SN反馈处方的变化敏感,而AGN反馈处方的变化具有最小的影响。我们还发现Illustristng和Simba运行之间的OVII色谱柱密度有显着差异。我们得出的结论是,观察到的OVII色谱柱密度之间的张力无法通过骆驼中实施的各种反馈模型来解释。
Known as the "Missing Baryon Problem", about one-third of baryons in the local universe remain unaccounted for. The missing baryons are thought to reside in the warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) of the cosmic web filaments, which are challenging to detect. Recent Chandra X-ray observations used a novel stacking analysis and detected an OVII absorption line toward the sightline of a luminous quasar, hinting that the missing baryons may reside in the WHIM. To explore how the properties of the OVII absorption line depend on feedback physics, we compare the observational results with predictions obtained from the Cosmology and Astrophysics with MachinE Learning (CAMEL) Simulation suite. CAMELS consists of cosmological simulations with state-of-the-art supernova (SN) and active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback models from the IllustrisTNG and SIMBA simulations, with varying strengths. We find that the simulated OVII column densities are higher in the outskirts of galaxies than in the large-scale WHIM, but they are consistently lower than those obtained in the Chandra observations, for all feedback runs. We establish that the OVII distribution is primarily sensitive to changes in the SN feedback prescription, whereas changes in the AGN feedback prescription have minimal impact. We also find significant differences in the OVII column densities between the IllustrisTNG and SIMBA runs. We conclude that the tension between the observed and simulated OVII column densities cannot be explained by the wide range of feedback models implemented in CAMELS.