论文标题
比较机器人到人类移交轨迹的主观看法
Comparing Subjective Perceptions of Robot-to-Human Handover Trajectories
论文作者
论文摘要
出于安全原因,机器人必须在人周围清晰地移动,尤其是对于可能进行身体接触的任务。这样的任务就是移交,它需要在发生物理接触(对象传输)的何时何地进行隐式沟通。在这项工作中,我们研究机器人在到达阶段使用的轨迹模型是否会影响机器人到人类移交的接收者的主观看法。我们进行了一项用户研究,其中将32名参与者交给了三个具有四个轨迹模型的对象:三个是最小混蛋轨迹的版本,另一个是基于椭圆形的轨迹。对所有轨迹的移交的起始位置均已固定,并且允许末端位置在固定位置周围随机变化$ \ pm $ \ pm $ 3厘米。用户研究发现,与安全性,可预测性,自然性和其他主观指标有关的调查问题中的切换轨迹之间没有显着差异。尽管这些结果似乎拒绝了轨迹影响人类对移交的看法的假设,但它促使未来的研究来研究其他变量的效果,例如机器人速度,对象转移位置,转移点处的对象方向以及明确的通信信号,例如凝视和言语。
Robots must move legibly around people for safety reasons, especially for tasks where physical contact is possible. One such task is handovers, which requires implicit communication on where and when physical contact (object transfer) occurs. In this work, we study whether the trajectory model used by a robot during the reaching phase affects the subjective perceptions of receivers for robot-to-human handovers. We conducted a user study where 32 participants were handed over three objects with four trajectory models: three were versions of a minimum jerk trajectory, and one was an ellipse-fitting-based trajectory. The start position of the handover was fixed for all trajectories, and the end position was allowed to vary randomly around a fixed position by $\pm$3 cm in all axis. The user study found no significant differences among the handover trajectories in survey questions relating to safety, predictability, naturalness, and other subjective metrics. While these results seemingly reject the hypothesis that the trajectory affects human perceptions of a handover, it prompts future research to investigate the effect of other variables, such as robot speed, object transfer position, object orientation at the transfer point, and explicit communication signals such as gaze and speech.