论文标题
无线指纹本地化的资源感知深度学习
Resource-aware Deep Learning for Wireless Fingerprinting Localization
论文作者
论文摘要
基于位置的服务已经在最终用户中流行,现在不可避免地成为新的无线基础架构和新兴业务流程的一部分。越来越受欢迎的深度学习(DL)人工智能方法基于广泛的室内无线电测量数据,在无线指纹定位方面表现出色。但是,随着复杂性的增加,这些方法在计算上变得非常密集和饥饿,无论是因为它们的训练还是随后的操作。考虑到只有移动用户,估计到2025年底估计超过74亿,并且假设为这些用户服务的网络平均每小时只能执行一个本地化,则用于计算的机器学习模型需要执行$ 65 \ tims 10^{12 {12} $预测。再加上这个等式,数千亿其他连接的设备和应用程序很大程度上依赖于更频繁的位置更新,并且显然,除非开发和使用更节能的模型,否则本地化将对碳排放产生重大贡献。在本章中,我们讨论了无线本地化的最新结果和趋势,并研究了实现更可持续的AI的途径。然后,我们详细介绍了用于计算DL模型复杂性,能耗和碳足迹的方法,并在一个具体示例上显示了如何开发更多资源感知的指纹模型。我们最终将相关作品在复杂性和培训公司方面进行比较。$ _2 $足迹。
Location based services, already popular with end users, are now inevitably becoming part of new wireless infrastructures and emerging business processes. The increasingly popular Deep Learning (DL) artificial intelligence methods perform very well in wireless fingerprinting localization based on extensive indoor radio measurement data. However, with the increasing complexity these methods become computationally very intensive and energy hungry, both for their training and subsequent operation. Considering only mobile users, estimated to exceed 7.4 billion by the end of 2025, and assuming that the networks serving these users will need to perform only one localization per user per hour on average, the machine learning models used for the calculation would need to perform $65 \times 10^{12}$ predictions per year. Add to this equation tens of billions of other connected devices and applications that rely heavily on more frequent location updates, and it becomes apparent that localization will contribute significantly to carbon emissions unless more energy-efficient models are developed and used. In this Chapter, we discuss the latest results and trends in wireless localization and look at paths towards achieving more sustainable AI. We then elaborate on a methodology for computing DL model complexity, energy consumption and carbon footprint and show on a concrete example how to develop a more resource-aware model for fingerprinting. We finally compare relevant works in terms of complexity and training CO$_2$ footprint.