论文标题

评估中微子诱导的带电亲Pion的理论数据张力:最终核子扭曲的影响

Assessing the theory-data tension in neutrino-induced charged pion production: the effect of final-state nucleon distortion

论文作者

Nikolakopoulos, Alexis, González-Jiménez, Raúl, Jachowicz, Natalie, Udías, José Manuel

论文摘要

在涉及少数GEV中微子的实验中,核上的pion产生构成了总横截面的重要一部分。对氘和较重核的数据的结合分析表明,气泡室数据与矿工$ν$ A的数据之间的紧张关系通常归因于未指定的核效应。为了了解这些紧张局势的起源,需要一个微观量子机械框架来计算核基质元素。我们使用局部近似对相对论扭曲的波冲脉冲近似(RDWIA)来评估最终状态核子失真的作用。为了在与中微子实验相关的条件下进行此比较,我们计算了矿工$ν$ A和T2K带电的PION生产数据集的横截面。核子失真的包含会导致横截面的降低至10 \%,但在通量平均横截面的形状上没有显着变化。与实验数据相比,有和没有失真的结果,除了低$ q^2 $矿工$ν$ a $π^+$数据。我们指出,来自BEBC的氢目标数据在低$ Q^2 $中也被过度预测,并且与矿工$ν$ a数据相比,差异的形状和数量级相似。仅包括核子失真,无法解释由矿工$ν$ a测量的低$ q^2 $横截面的过度预测。 BEBC数据的类似预测对氢的数据意味着不可能仅将这种差异归因于核效应。轴向耦合及其$ q^2 $依赖性理想情况下应源自氢和氘的更精确的数据。

Pion production on nuclei constitutes a significant part of the total cross section in experiments involving few-GeV neutrinos. Combined analyses of data on deuterium and heavier nuclei points to tensions between the bubble chamber data and the data of the MINER$ν$A experiment, which are often ascribed to unspecified nuclear effects. To understand the origin of these tensions, a microscopic quantum mechanical framework is needed to compute nuclear matrix elements. We use the local approximation to the relativistic distorted wave impulse approximation (RDWIA) to assess the role of final-state nucleon distortion. To perform this comparison under conditions relevant to neutrino experiments, we compute cross sections for the MINER$ν$A and T2K charged pion production datasets. The inclusion of nucleon distortion leads to a reduction of the cross section up to 10\%, but to no significant change in shape of the flux-averaged cross sections. Results with and without distortion compare favorably to experimental data, with the exception of the low-$Q^2$ MINER$ν$A $π^+$ data. We point out that hydrogen target data from BEBC is also overpredicted at low-$Q^2$, and that the discrepancy is similar in shape and magnitude to what is found in comparison to MINER$ν$A data. Including nucleon distortion alone cannot explain the overprediction of low-$Q^2$ cross sections measured by MINER$ν$A. The similar overprediction of BEBC data on hydrogen means that it is impossible to ascribe this discrepancy solely to a nuclear effect. Axial couplings and their $Q^2$ dependence should ideally be derived from more precise data on hydrogen and deuterium.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源