论文标题
乌克兰机构在Scopus占据的标题中的作者分析出版物
Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus-delisted titles
论文作者
论文摘要
在乌克兰，Scopus数据用于评估学者。乌克兰评估系统中的现有缺点使他们可以在已从Scopus中脱颖而出的标题中发布，并继续将这些论文用作可靠的研究成果进行评估。这项研究的目的是分析乌克兰机构在2011年至2020年之间在不同领域的Scopus命名的头衔中的出版活动（截至2021年9月），并试图欣赏这种做法在乌克兰作家中的普遍性。 Scopus获取用于收集书目和引用相关数据，而散布则用于分析这些数据。研究结果表明，对于17个乌克兰机构来说，从Scopus中脱颖而出的书籍的论文仍然是其员工出版成就的重要角色。特别是，在经济学，计量经济学和金融领域，有46.92％的乌克兰论文以Scopus排除在外的标题中。此外，该分析表明，在两个乌克兰机构中，此类论文的引用水平大大超过了同一年和同一领域的Scopus指数论文的平均引用数量。鉴于在其他东欧国家也使用了文献计量指标进行研究评估，因此本文的结果适用于更广泛的地理环境。
In Ukraine, Scopus data are used to evaluate academics. Existing shortcomings in the Ukrainian evaluation system allow them to publish in titles that have been delisted from Scopus, and continue to use those papers as credible research output for evaluation. The purpose of this study was to analyse the publishing activity of Ukrainian institutions in Scopus-delisted titles (as of September 2021) in different fields between 2011 and 2020 and to attempt to appreciate how common this practice is among Ukrainian authors. Scopus was sourced to collect bibliographic and citations-related data, while SciVal was used to analyse these data. The findings suggest that for 17 Ukrainian institutions, papers from titles that have been delisted from Scopus still play an important part of the publication achievement of their employees. In particular, in the field of economics, econometrics and finance, 46.92% of Ukrainian papers were published in a title that was excluded from Scopus. Moreover, the analysis indicated that in two Ukrainian institutions, the level of citation of such papers significantly exceeds the average number of citations to Scopus-indexed papers in the same year and in the same field. Given that bibliometric indicators are also used for research assessment in other Eastern European countries, the results of this paper are applicable to a wider geographic context.
