论文标题
EXOMARS TGO颜色和立体表面成像系统的机架辐射校准
In-flight radiometric calibration of the ExoMars TGO Colour and Stereo Surface Imaging System
论文作者
论文摘要
EXOMAR的颜色和立体表面科学成像系统(Cassis)痕量气体轨道器每天平均返回火星表面的二十张图像,其中大多数为3或4种颜色,其中一些以立体声为单位。 Cassis使用推动框架方法来获取彩色图像,其中四个带通滤波器直接沉积在传感器上方,并且与地面轨道速度同步的成像节奏,以覆盖成像区域,并具有数十个小的,部分重叠的图像。后来将这些“框架”进行映射并进行摩西以构建最终图像。这种方法在辐射校准方面既具有优势和挑战。虽然通过数十次连续的图像的频繁且快速获取,从相邻的框架组装的镶嵌物突出了探测器的偏见和变化,而摩西式的频率频繁地收集得出了大大增强。在Cassis图像上已经确定了这两个问题,总体强度较低(多达少数),但足以在最终组装的颜色图像上产生突出的人工制品。因此,我们开发了校正这些人工制品的方法,这些人物现在已包含在辐射校准管道中。我们在这里详细介绍了校准过程的不同步骤以及用于校准的产品的产生,并讨论了校正的功效。偏置和平地框架上的相对不确定性分别为0.2和0.1 percents。绝对辐射校准的不确定性是3个percents,对于这种仪器而言,这很低。杂志估计估计的绝对校准估计误差约为1%。校正杂志和偏置偏移后的残留物是几个DNS到数十DNS的顺序。
The Colour and Stereo Surface Science Imaging System (CaSSIS) of the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter returns on average twenty images per day of the Martian surface, most of them in 3 or 4 colours and some of them in stereo. CaSSIS uses a push-frame approach to acquire colour images, with four bandpass filters deposited directly above the sensor and an imaging cadence synchronized with the ground track velocity to cover the imaged area with tens of small, partially overlapping images. These "framelets" are later map-projected and mosaicked to build the final image. This approach offers both advantages and challenges in terms of radiometric calibration. While the collection of dark and flatfield frames is considerably enhanced by the frequent and fast acquisition of tens of successive images, mosaics assembled from the adjacent framelets highlight the straylight and changes in the bias of the detector. Both issues have been identified on CaSSIS images, with low intensities overall (up to a few percents), but sufficient to generate prominent artefacts on the final assembled colour images. We have therefore developed methods to correct these artefacts that are now included into the radiometric calibration pipeline. We detail here the different steps of the calibration procedure and the generation of the products used for calibration, and discuss the efficacy of the corrections. The relative uncertainties on the bias and flatfield frames are low, of the order of 0.2 and 0.1 percents, respectively. The uncertainty on the absolute radiometric calibration is of 3 percents, which is quite low for such an instrument. The straylight adds an estimated about 1 percent error to the absolute calibration. The residuals after corrections of the straylight and bias offsets are of the order of a few DNs to tens of DNs.