论文标题
由FEA计算的股骨近端骨折负荷和能量到失败的新髋部骨折风险指数
A New Hip Fracture Risk Index Derived from FEA-Computed Proximal Femur Fracture Loads and Energies-to-Failure
论文作者
论文摘要
髋部骨折风险评估是一项重要但具有挑战性的任务。基于定量CT的患者特异性有限元分析(FEA)计算力(断裂负荷)以在特定的负载条件下打破近端股骨。它提供了有关近端股骨的不同结构信息,这些信息可能会影响受试者的总体骨折风险。为了获得更强大的骨折风险度量,我们使用主要成分分析(PCA)开发全球FEA计算的断裂风险指数,该裂缝风险指数结合了FEA计算的产量,最终失败负荷以及在四个加载条件下失败的能量(单个LIMB姿势(单个LIMB)(单个LIMB的姿势,并从跌落后的较大的时期,后方)的FRER型和后期的fr fr FR FRES和23个trorsers anip and trols fr fre。来自年龄 - 雷克雅未克研究的对照受试者匹配。我们发现,Fe参数的第一台PC(PC1)是髋部骨折的唯一重要预测指标。使用逻辑回归模型,我们确定使用PC1的髋部骨折的预测性能是否与通过分层随机重新采样相对于髋部骨折状态的Fe参数有所不同。结果表明,使用PC1的接收操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积的平均值始终高于使用男性受试者合并的所有Fe参数的平均值。 PC1的AUC和Fe参数的AUC组合与女性受试者或所有受试者中的AUC无显着差异
Hip fracture risk assessment is an important but challenging task. Quantitative CT-based patient specific finite element analysis (FEA) computes the force (fracture load) to break the proximal femur in a particular loading condition. It provides different structural information about the proximal femur that can influence a subject overall fracture risk. To obtain a more robust measure of fracture risk, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to develop a global FEA computed fracture risk index that incorporates the FEA-computed yield and ultimate failure loads and energies to failure in four loading conditions (single-limb stance and impact from a fall onto the posterior, posterolateral, and lateral aspects of the greater trochanter) of 110 hip fracture subjects and 235 age and sex matched control subjects from the AGES-Reykjavik study. We found that the first PC (PC1) of the FE parameters was the only significant predictor of hip fracture. Using a logistic regression model, we determined if prediction performance for hip fracture using PC1 differed from that using FE parameters combined by stratified random resampling with respect to hip fracture status. The results showed that the average of the area under the receive operating characteristic curve (AUC) using PC1 was always higher than that using all FE parameters combined in the male subjects. The AUC of PC1 and AUC of the FE parameters combined were not significantly different than that in the female subjects or in all subjects