论文标题
部分可观测时空混沌系统的无模型预测
The quality of the Web of Science data: a longitudinal study on the completeness of authors-addresses links
论文作者
论文摘要
作者处理链接是用于多种目的的基本要素，例如作者的歧义，出版物的信用归因和分数计数，对科学网络的分析，科学网络的分析等。在本文中，我们分析了作者处理的链接在2000年和2021年之间的科学（WOS）数据库中的链接（WOS）的质量。角度：WOS索引，文档类型和每个出版物的作者数量。分析表明，从2008年开始，作者交流链接开始得到充分了解。从2016年开始，所有地址和所有作者链接的出版物的份额接近100％。结果表明，根据WOS指数，文档类型和作者的数量，根据WOS指数的差异很大。与SCI不同，AHCI是最高完整率的指数。对于文档类型，这些是会议程序，完整性率更好和/或可以完成。关于作者的数量，统计数据表明，数量越高，地址越多，没有链接的作者就越多。最后，对100个出版物的随机样本的分析表明，在超过50％的案例中，原始出版物中不存在作者地址链接，并且WOS仅复制了编辑者提供的可用信息。
The author-affiliation links are the essential elements used for multiple purposes, such as the disambiguation of authors, the attribution of credits of a publication and fractional counting, the analysis of scientific networks, etc. In this article we analyzed the author-affiliation link quality in the Web of Science (WoS) database between 2000 and 2021. We analyzed the link completeness for 32,676,914 scientific publications under different angles: WoS index, document type and the number of authors per publication. The analysis showed that the author-affiliation link begins to be well informed from 2008. The share of publications for which all addresses and all authors are linked is close to 100% from 2016. The results show a strong variability according to the WoS index, the document type and the number of authors per publication. AHCI is the index with the highest completeness rate, unlike the SCI. For the document type, these are the Conference proceedings where the completeness rate is better and/or can be completed. Regarding the number of authors, statistics show that the higher the number, the more addresses and unlinked authors there are. Finally, the analysis of a random sample of 100 publications showed that in more than 50% of the cases, the author-address links do not exist in the original publication, and the WoS reproduced only the available information provided by the editor.
