论文标题
与DIIII-D基座中的FARADAY效应径向干涉仪极光计相比,旋转模拟的磁波
Gyrokinetic Simulations Compared with Magnetic Fluctuations Diagnosed with a Faraday-Effect Radial Interferometer-Polarimeter in the DIII-D pedestal
论文作者
论文摘要
与使用陀螺仪电磁数值实验(Gene)相比,对DIII-D中电磁波动的实验数据进行了实验数据。诊断具有对波动磁场进行内部测量的独特功能,$ \ frac {\ intn_eΔB_rdr} {\ int int n_e dr} $。局部线性模拟在大量的环形模式数字($ n = 15 $的峰值)上识别微功能模式(MTMS),频率与实验数据非常吻合。局部非线性模拟通过与RIP诊断的磁性频谱良好一致,从而加强了这一结果。模拟的热通量在实验性期望的范围内。但是,磁波幅度大大低于实验预期。讨论了这种差异的可能来源,尤其是诊断位置位于中间平面的事实 - 模拟预测波动振幅最小的多背性位置。尽管存在一些差异,但模拟和实验之间的几个连接,结合了区分潜在基座不稳定性的一般标准,强烈指出MTM是观察到的磁波动的来源。
Experimental data on electromagnetic fluctuations in DIII-D, made available by the Faraday-effect Radial Interferometer-Polarimeter (RIP) diagnostic, is examined in comparison with detailed gyrokinetic simulations using Gyrokinetic Electromagnetic Numerical Experiment (GENE). The diagnostic has the unique capability of making internal measurements of fluctuating magnetic fields $\frac{\int n_e δB_r dR}{\int n_e dR}$. Local linear simulations identify microtearing modes (MTMs) over a substantial range of toroidal mode numbers (peaking at $n=15$) with frequencies in good agreement with the experimental data. Local nonlinear simulations reinforce this result by producing a magnetic frequency spectrum in good agreement with that diagnosed by RIP. Simulated heat fluxes are in the range of experimental expectations. However, magnetic fluctuation amplitudes are substantially lower than the experimental expectations. Possible sources of this discrepancy are discussed, notably the fact that the diagnostics are localized at the mid-plane -- the poloidal location where the simulations predict the fluctuation amplitudes to be smallest. Despite some discrepancies, several connections between simulations and experiments, combined with general criteria discriminating between potential pedestal instabilities, strongly point to MTMs as the source of the observed magnetic fluctuations.