论文标题
“爱因斯坦 - 波多尔斯基 - 罗森悖论”的解决方案
The solution to the "Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox"
论文作者
论文摘要
1935年，阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦（Albert Einstein），鲍里斯·波多尔斯基（Boris Podolsky）和内森·罗森（Nathan Rosen）（'epr'）在一个思想实验中报道，他们认为量子理论提供了对现实的不完整描述。今天，我们知道量子理论是对自然的完整描述（在平坦的时空中）。 EPR思想实验是通过量子理论预测的，此后已通过实验证实。但是，EPR实验没有物理图形解释，被认为是“悖论”的一部分。在这里，我解决了“悖论”。我与量子理论的任何解释无关，表明EPR（思想）实验是存在真实随机性和能量保存的直接而令人信服的结果。显而易见的是，EPR（思想）实验允许对真正随机测量值进行精确预测。本地隐藏变量没有动力。
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen ('EPR') reported on a thought experiment that they believed showed that quantum theory provided an incomplete description of reality. Today we know that quantum theory is a complete and correct description of Nature (in flat space-time). The EPR thought experiment is predicted by quantum theory and has since been experimentally confirmed. However, EPR experiments have no physical pictorial explanation, and are considered part of a "paradox". Here I resolve the "paradox". I show independently of any interpretation of quantum theory that EPR (thought) experiments are a direct and compelling consequence of the existence of true randomness and the conservation of energy. It becomes obvious why EPR (thought) experiments allow for the precise prediction of truly random measurement values. Local hidden variables are not motivated.
