论文标题
回复“评论$ f（q）$重力中的'能源条件””
Reply to "Comment on `Energy Conditions in $f(Q)$ gravity'"
论文作者
论文摘要
最近，Avik De和L.T.声称我们尚未遵循$ f（q）$重力的有效理论方法，缺少相关术语来计算能量条件[物理。修订版D 102，024057（2020）]。他们还指出，我们没有提出压力和能量密度如何遵循一组能量条件标准。在此答复中，我们显示了评论中发现的有效密度和有效压力如何产生我们文章中介绍的相同的弗里德曼方程。因此，我们声称该评论仅引入了同等的途径来推导Friedmann方程，并提出Avik de和L.T.找到的额外术语。他们的特定定义对其有效密度和有效压力的结果如何。但是，此类术语不会更改$ρ$和$ p $的方程式。因此，这些额外的术语不会改变我们在物理中提出的能量限制。修订版D 102，024057（2020）。
Recently, Avik De and L.T. How claim that we have not followed an effective theory approach for $f(Q)$ gravity, missing relevant terms to compute the energy conditions [Phys. Rev. D 102, 024057 (2020)]. They also state that we did not present how the pressure and energy density follow a set of energy condition criteria. In this reply we show how the effective density and effective pressure found in the comment yield to the same Fridmann Equations presented in our article. Therefore, we claim that the comment only introduces an equivalent path to derive the Friedmann Equations and that the extra terms found by Avik De and L.T. How are consequence of their specific definition for their effective density and effective pressure. However, such terms do not change the equations for $ρ$ and $p$. Consequently, these extra terms are not going to change the energy constraints presented by us in Phys. Rev. D 102, 024057 (2020).
