论文标题
基于技能评分的太阳预测的荟萃分析
A Meta-Analysis of Solar Forecasting Based on Skill Score
论文作者
论文摘要
我们根据技能评分进行了确定性太阳预测的首次全面荟萃分析,筛选了Google Scholar的1,447篇论文,并审查了320篇论文的全文以进行数据提取。用多元自适应回归样条建模,部分依赖图和线性回归构建和分析了4,687点的数据库。量化了对十个因素的技能评分的边际影响。该分析显示了数据库中变量之间的非线性和复杂相互作用。预测范围具有核心影响,并主导了其他因素的影响。因此,应为每个视野分别进行太阳预测的分析。气候变量与技能评分具有统计学意义的相关性。关于输入,历史数据和空间时间信息非常有帮助。对于日内,天空和卫星图像显示最重要。对于白天,数值的天气预测和局部测量的气象数据非常有效。比较了所有预测模型。整体杂交模型可实现所有视野的最准确的预测。杂化模型在时间内显示出优势,而基于图像的方法是日内预测最有效的。更多的培训数据可以提高技能得分。但是,当训练数据过多(超过2000天)时,观察到过度拟合。太阳预测的准确性有了很大的提高,尤其是近年来。与日期预测相比,时间内和日内的预测要有所改善。通过控制预测之间的关键差异,包括位置变量,我们的发现可以在全球应用。
We conduct the first comprehensive meta-analysis of deterministic solar forecasting based on skill score, screening 1,447 papers from Google Scholar and reviewing the full texts of 320 papers for data extraction. A database of 4,687 points was built and analyzed with multivariate adaptive regression spline modelling, partial dependence plots, and linear regression. The marginal impacts on skill score of ten factors were quantified. The analysis shows the non-linearity and complex interaction between variables in the database. Forecast horizon has a central impact and dominates other factors' impacts. Therefore, the analysis of solar forecasts should be done separately for each horizon. Climate zone variables have statistically significant correlation with skill score. Regarding inputs, historical data and spatial temporal information are highly helpful. For intra-day, sky and satellite images show the most importance. For day-ahead, numerical weather predictions and locally measured meteorological data are very efficient. All forecast models were compared. Ensemble-hybrid models achieve the most accurate forecasts for all horizons. Hybrid models show superiority for intra-hour while image-based methods are the most efficient for intra-day forecasts. More training data can enhance skill score. However, over-fitting is observed when there is too much training data (longer than 2000 days). There has been a substantial improvement in solar forecast accuracy, especially in recent years. More improvement is observed for intra-hour and intra-day than day-ahead forecasts. By controlling for the key differences between forecasts, including location variables, our findings can be applied globally.