论文标题
NFL的特许经营标签对球员来说是公平的吗？
Is the NFL's franchise tag fair to players?
论文作者
论文摘要
在过去的十年中，由于其有偏见的机构而不是球员而不是球员，因此在过去的十年中，人们一直受到NFL特许经营标签的货币限制的一致批评。但是，NFL的特许经营标签对球员是否公平或不公平的问题从未被系统地研究。在本文中，我调查了NFL玩家在特许经营标签上与不在时的效果，并通过统计和经济镜头对其进行分析。通过我的研究，我发现当前的特许经营标签名称对合同延期而言是不公平的。然后，我提出了一种解决这种不公平性的解决方案，即删除有机会员多年的特许经营者的机会，并为玩家提供一个选择的选项，可以进行任何测试自由球员，但要获得零薪，直到他们达成合同（团队也可以符合报价）或签署特许经营标签）或为球员和球队提供更多的灵活性。
There has been a consistent criticism over the past decade of the NFL franchise tag's monetary limitations due to its biased institutions in favor of the team rather than the player. But the question whether the NFL's franchise tag is fair or unfair to players has never been systematically studied. In this paper, I investigate the effects of NFL players' contract extensions when on a franchise tag compared to when they are not and analyze them through statistical and economic lens. Through my research, I find that indeed the current franchise tag designation is unfair to players when it comes to contract extension. I then propose a solution to remedy this unfairness, that is, removing the opportunity to franchise tag players for multiple years, and adding an option for the player to either test free agency but receive zero pay until they settle on a contract (the team can also match the offer) or sign the franchise tag, to provide more flexibility for the player and the team.
