论文标题
低音XXXII:研究ALMA的核MM波连续排放,Alma在尺度上$ \ Lessim $ 100-200 PC
BASS XXXII: Studying the Nuclear Mm-wave Continuum Emission of AGNs with ALMA at Scales $\lesssim$ 100-200 pc
论文作者
论文摘要
要了解主动银河核(AGNS)中核($ \ Lessim $ 100 PC)毫米波(MM-WAVE)连续排放,我们系统地分析了附近的Agns($ Z <$ 0.05)的Sub-arcssec分辨率band-6(211-275 GHz)ALMA数据的ALMA数据,来自Swift/700-swift/70-swift/swift/swift/70-swift/swift/swift/swift/swift/swift/swift cat cat。该样本几乎不偏向被模糊的系统,迄今为止提供了最多的AGN,并提供高MM波空间分辨率采样($ \ sim $ 1-200 PC),并且跨度为14-150 Kev Luminosity {$ 40 <\ log log [l _ _ {l _ {\ rm 14-150}/(rm 14-150}/(RM 14-150}/(}) 45 $},黑洞质量[$ 5 <\ log(m _ {\ rm bh}/m_ \ odot)<10 $]和eddington的比率($ -4 <\logλ_{\ rm edd} <2 $)。我们发现1.3毫米(230 GHz)和14-150 KEV亮度之间存在显着相关性。它的散布为$ \ $ 0.36 dex,MM波排放可以充当AGN光度的良好代理,无需灰尘灭绝,最多可达$ n _ {\ rm H} \ sim 10^{26} $ cm $ $ $^{ - 2} $。虽然MM波发射可以根据过去的作品周围X射线电晕周围自我吸收的同步辐射,但我们也讨论了MM波发射的不同可能起源。与AGN相关的尘埃排放,流出驱动的冲击和小型($ <$ 200 PC)喷气机。灰尘发射不太可能占主导地位,因为MM波坡度通常比预期的要平坦。同样,由于Eddington比率没有MM波亮度的增加,因此辐射驱动的流出模型可能不是常见机制。此外,我们发现MM波亮度的独立性在核结构极性轴的指标上,这与射流模型不一致,其光度仅取决于角度。
To understand the origin of nuclear ($\lesssim$ 100 pc) millimeter-wave (mm-wave) continuum emission in active galactic nuclei (AGNs), we systematically analyzed sub-arcsec resolution Band-6 (211-275 GHz) ALMA data of 98 nearby AGNs ($z <$ 0.05) from the 70-month Swift/BAT catalog. The sample, almost unbiased for obscured systems, provides the largest number of AGNs to date with high mm-wave spatial resolution sampling ($\sim$ 1-200 pc), and spans broad ranges of 14-150 keV luminosity {$40 < \log[L_{\rm 14-150}/({\rm erg\,s^{-1}})] < 45$}, black hole mass [$5 < \log(M_{\rm BH}/M_\odot) < 10$], and Eddington ratio ($-4 < \log λ_{\rm Edd} < 2$). We find a significant correlation between 1.3 mm (230 GHz) and 14-150 keV luminosities. Its scatter is $\approx$ 0.36 dex, and the mm-wave emission may serve as a good proxy of the AGN luminosity, free of dust extinction up to $N_{\rm H} \sim 10^{26}$ cm$^{-2}$. While the mm-wave emission could be self-absorbed synchrotron radiation around the X-ray corona according to past works, we also discuss different possible origins of the mm-wave emission; AGN-related dust emission, outflow-driven shocks, and a small-scale ($<$ 200 pc) jet. The dust emission is unlikely to be dominant, as the mm-wave slope is generally flatter than expected. Also, due to no increase in the mm-wave luminosity with the Eddington ratio, a radiation-driven outflow model is possibly not the common mechanism. Furthermore, we find independence of the mm-wave luminosity on indicators of the inclination angle from the polar axis of the nuclear structure, which is inconsistent with a jet model whose luminosity depends only on the angle.