论文标题

非共同概率理论中的代数群体重新审视

Algebraic groups in non-commutative probability theory revisited

论文作者

Chevyrev, Ilya, Ebrahimi-Fard, Kurusch, Patras, Frédéric

论文摘要

冯·沃尔登菲尔斯(Von Waldenfels)和舒尔曼(Schürmann)学院长期以来一直在倡导山地和代数群体在非交通概率中的作用。最近,基于洗牌和前的演算引入了另一种代数方法,并导致了编码状态行为的另一组字符组的构造。比较这两种方法,第一种方法最近用Manzel和Schürmann的一般分类语言重新铸造,可以在很大程度上被普遍产品理论所驱动,而第二层构造则建立在Hopf代数和合适的代数基础上,并且是对非跨设定套件组合的组合。尽管两者都解决了相同的现象,但在两个观点之间移动并不明显。我们在这里提出了通过显式使HOPF代数之间的连接来统一两种方法的尝试。尽管在很大程度上依靠经典思想以及与Manzel和Schürmann上述作品密切相关的结果,但我们的演讲仍然是原始的,但在几个方面仍然是原始的,并且填补了非交通概率文献的空白。特别是,我们系统地使用代数群体的语言和技术以及洗牌组技术,以证明两个代数群体的概念自然与自由,布尔值和单调的自然相关,概率理论都可以确定。我们还为文献中隐含的各种HOPF代数结构和细节论点获得了明确的公式。

The role of coalgebras as well as algebraic groups in non-commutative probability has long been advocated by the school of von Waldenfels and Schürmann. Another algebraic approach was introduced more recently, based on shuffle and pre-Lie calculus, and results in another construction of groups of characters encoding the behaviour of states. Comparing the two, the first approach, recast recently in a general categorical language by Manzel and Schürmann, can be seen as largely driven by the theory of universal products, whereas the second construction builds on Hopf algebras and a suitable algebraization of the combinatorics of noncrossing set partitions. Although both address the same phenomena, moving between the two viewpoints is not obvious. We present here an attempt to unify the two approaches by making explicit the Hopf algebraic connections between them. Our presentation, although relying largely on classical ideas as well as results closely related to Manzel and Schürmann's aforementioned work, is nevertheless original on several points and fills a gap in the non-commutative probability literature. In particular, we systematically use the language and techniques of algebraic groups together with shuffle group techniques to prove that two notions of algebraic groups naturally associated with free, respectively Boolean and monotone, probability theories identify. We also obtain explicit formulas for various Hopf algebraic structures and detail arguments that had been left implicit in the literature.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源