论文标题

评估用于音景评估的具有成本效益的耳机校准程序

Assessment of a cost-effective headphone calibration procedure for soundscape evaluations

论文作者

Lam, Bhan, Ooi, Kenneth, Ong, Zhen-Ting, Watcharasupat, Karn N., Wong, Trevor, Gan, Woon-Seng

论文摘要

为了提高音景标准的可用性和采用,提出了一种低成本的校准程序,用于在耳机上复制音频刺激,作为全球``Soundscape属性翻译项目''(SATP)的一部分,用于验证ISO/TS 〜12913-2:2018感知的感知的情感质量质量(PAQ)。先前的初步研究表明,使用开放电路电压(OCV)校准过程,与预期的等效连续A加权声压级别($ L _ {\ text {a,eq}} $)差异。对于更整体的以人为中心的观点,这里进一步研究了OCV方法,从心理声学参数方面进行了研究,包括相关的超级水平,以说明对SATP的同一27刺激的时间影响。此外,进行了3​​6名参与者的受试者内实验,以检查OCV校准对ISO/TS〜12913-2:2018中PAQ属性的影响。对客观指标的平淡 - 阿尔特曼分析揭示了所有加权声音和响度指标的OCV方法的巨大偏见。和\ si {5} {\%}和\ si {10} {\%}超级级别的粗糙度指示器。在刺激的大约\ si {20} {\%}中观察到由于OCV方法引起的显着感知差异,这与有偏见的声学指标并不清楚。尽管如此,由于小规模和未配对的样品而导致的客观和感知差异的警告解释为进一步研究提供了理由。

To increase the availability and adoption of the soundscape standard, a low-cost calibration procedure for reproduction of audio stimuli over headphones was proposed as part of the global ``Soundscape Attributes Translation Project'' (SATP) for validating ISO/TS~12913-2:2018 perceived affective quality (PAQ) attribute translations. A previous preliminary study revealed significant deviations from the intended equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels ($L_{\text{A,eq}}$) using the open-circuit voltage (OCV) calibration procedure. For a more holistic human-centric perspective, the OCV method is further investigated here in terms of psychoacoustic parameters, including relevant exceedance levels to account for temporal effects on the same 27 stimuli from the SATP. Moreover, a within-subjects experiment with 36 participants was conducted to examine the effects of OCV calibration on the PAQ attributes in ISO/TS~12913-2:2018. Bland-Altman analysis of the objective indicators revealed large biases in the OCV method across all weighted sound level and loudness indicators; and roughness indicators at \SI{5}{\%} and \SI{10}{\%} exceedance levels. Significant perceptual differences due to the OCV method were observed in about \SI{20}{\%} of the stimuli, which did not correspond clearly with the biased acoustic indicators. A cautioned interpretation of the objective and perceptual differences due to small and unpaired samples nevertheless provide grounds for further investigation.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源