论文标题

7 Tesla处的高分辨率扩散加权成像:单发读数轨迹及其对信噪比,空间分辨率和准确性的影响

High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging at 7 Tesla: single-shot readout trajectories and their impact on signal-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution and accuracy

论文作者

Feizollah, Sajjad, Tardif, Christine L.

论文摘要

扩散MRI(DMRI)是一种在体内研究大脑的有价值的成像技术。但是,DMRI的分辨率受到该技术的低信噪比(SNR)的限制。已经制定了各种收购策略来实现高分辨率,但需要扫描时间长。在超高场(UHF)的成像可能会进一步增加单发DMRI的SNR;但是,较短的T2*和更大的场不均匀性将降低图像质量。在这项研究中,我们调查了不同K空间轨迹的SNR和分辨率之间的权衡,包括回声平面成像(EPI),部分傅立叶EPI和螺旋,在7T的一系列分辨率上。有效分辨率,空间特异性和锐化效果是根据名义分辨率为0.6-1.8 mm的模拟扩散序列的点扩散函数(PSF)测量的。使用三个读出轨迹获得了体内扫描。现场探针用于测量直至3阶球形谐波的动态磁场。使用静态场图和测得的轨迹图像伪影,将T2*效应作为模糊的主要来源。在分数各向异性(FA)图中检查了有效分辨率。获得了体内扫描以计算SNR。 EPI轨迹具有最高的特异性,有效的分辨率和图像锐化效果,但SNR也大大降低。螺旋的SNR明显更高,但特异性较低。体内扫描的线图在相位和频率编码方向上显示出〜0.2单位在不同轨迹之间的FA值差异。对于螺旋的有效分辨率和标称分辨率之间的差异比EPI更大。但是,与EPI和PF-EPI轨迹相比,UHFS上较高的SNR螺旋轨迹使我们能够实现更高的有效分辨率。

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a valuable imaging technique to study the brain in vivo. However, the resolution of dMRI is limited by the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of this technique. Various acquisition strategies have been developed to achieve high resolutions, but they require long scan times. Imaging at ultra-high fields (UHF) could further increase the SNR of single-shot dMRI; however, the shorter T2* and the greater field non-uniformities will degrade image quality. In this study, we investigated the trade-off between the SNR and resolution of different k-space trajectories, including echo planar imaging (EPI), partial Fourier EPI, and spiral, over a range of resolutions at 7T. The effective resolution, spatial specificity and sharpening effect were measured from the point spread function (PSF) of the simulated diffusion sequences for a nominal resolution range of 0.6-1.8 mm. In-vivo scans were acquired using the three readout trajectories. Field probes were used to measure dynamic magnetic fields up to the 3rd order of spherical harmonics. Using a static field map and the measured trajectories image artifacts were corrected, leaving T2* effects as the primary source of blurring. The effective resolution was examined in fractional anisotropy (FA) maps. In-vivo scans were acquired to calculate the SNR. EPI trajectories had the highest specificity, effective resolution, and image sharpening effect, but also had substantially lower SNR. Spirals had significantly higher SNR, but lower specificity. Line plots of the in-vivo scans in phase and frequency encode directions showed ~0.2 units difference in FA values between the different trajectories. The difference between the effective and nominal resolution is greater for spirals than for EPI. However, the higher SNR of spiral trajectories at UHFs allows us to achieve higher effective resolutions compared to EPI and PF-EPI trajectories.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源