论文标题

氢网络在欧洲的潜在作用

The Potential Role of a Hydrogen Network in Europe

论文作者

Neumann, Fabian, Zeyen, Elisabeth, Victoria, Marta, Brown, Tom

论文摘要

近几十年来,欧洲的电力传输扩张在欧洲遭受了许多延误,尽管它对于将可再生电力整合到能源系统中的意义。重复现有化石气网网络的氢网络不仅可以帮助提供对低排放燃料的需求,而且还可以平衡整个大陆的风和太阳能的变化,从而避免电网扩展。我们通过改变净零二氧化碳情景中允许扩展电力和氢网格的允许扩展的欧洲能源系统,并具有较高的可再生能源份额来实现这一想法。我们涵盖了181个地区的电力,建筑物,运输,农业和工业部门,并每年的第三小时每三个小时进行模型。通过这种高时空的分辨率,该模型可以捕获传输网络中的瓶颈,需求和可再生供应的可变性,以及用于改造传统气体基础设施和地质氢存储的区域机会。我们的结果表明,使用泛元氢网络将系统成本降低一致,该网络将区域与低成本和丰富的可再生潜力联系起来,以供应中心,合成燃料生产和洞穴存储地点。开发氢网络每年将系统成本降低多达260亿欧元(3.4%),当无法实现电网增援时,收益最高。该网络的64%至69%可以由重新利用的天然气管道建立。但是,我们发现氢网络只能部分代替电网扩展。尽管两个网络共同扩展可以实现10%的最大成本节省,但只要可以接受较高的成本并进行监管变更以管理网格瓶颈,那么这两个网络的扩展都不是真正必不可少的。

Electricity transmission expansion has suffered many delays in Europe in recent decades, despite its significance for integrating renewable electricity into the energy system. A hydrogen network which reuses the existing fossil gas network could not only help to supply demand for low-emission fuels, but could also to balance variations in wind and solar energy across the continent and thus avoid power grid expansion. We pursue this idea by varying the allowed expansion of electricity and hydrogen grids in net-zero CO2 scenarios for a sector-coupled and self-sufficient European energy system with high shares of renewables. We cover the electricity, buildings, transport, agriculture, and industry sectors across 181 regions and model every third hour of a year. With this high spatio-temporal resolution, the model can capture bottlenecks in transmission networks, the variability of demand and renewable supply, as well as regional opportunities for the retrofitting of legacy gas infrastructure and the development of geological hydrogen storage. Our results show consistent system cost reductions with a pan-continental hydrogen network that connects regions with low-cost and abundant renewable potentials to demand centres, synthetic fuel production and cavern storage sites. Developing a hydrogen network reduces system costs by up to 26 billion Euros per year (3.4%), with the highest benefits when electricity grid reinforcements cannot be realised. Between 64% and 69% of this network could be built from repurposed natural gas pipelines. However, we find that hydrogen networks can only partially substitute for power grid expansion. While the expansion of both networks together can achieve the largest cost savings of 10%, the expansion of neither is truly essential as long as higher costs can be accepted and regulatory changes are made to manage grid bottlenecks.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源