论文标题
潮汐同步太阳能发电机：反驳
Tidally synchronized solar dynamo: a rebuttal
论文作者
论文摘要
太阳周期的行星起源的想法可以追溯到19世纪。尽管没有解决问题，但仍然有人提倡。 Stefani，Giesecke和Weier（2019）最近根据这个想法提出了一个场景。他们提出的一个关键论点是证据表明，$ \ sim $ 11年度的周期是时钟的。他们的演示基于对Dicke（1978）提出的比率的计算，该比率应用于Schove（1955）的太阳周期时间序列。我证明他们的示威是无效的，因为Schove用来建立他的时间序列的假设强迫了时钟的行为。我还表明，磁化流体中的不稳定性可以产生接近时钟的波动时间序列。
The idea of a planetary origin for the solar cycle dates back to the nineteenth century. Despite unsurmounted problems, it is still advocated by some. Stefani, Giesecke, and Weier (2019) thus recently proposed a scenario based on this idea. A key argument they put forward is evidence that the $\sim$11 years-solar cycle is clocked. Their demonstration rests upon the computation of a ratio proposed by Dicke (1978) applied to the solar cycle time series of Schove (1955). I show that their demonstration is invalid, because the assumptions used by Schove to build his time series force a clocked behaviour. I also show that instabilities in a magnetized fluid can produce fluctuation time series that are close to being clocked.
