论文标题
个性化医学的上下文排名和选择方法
A Contextual Ranking and Selection Method for Personalized Medicine
论文作者
论文摘要
问题定义:个性化医学(PM)在一组可用治疗方法中为每个患者寻求最佳治疗方法。由于传统上对所有患者的特定治疗方法都不能很好地奏效,因此根据医生的个人经验和专业知识选择了最佳治疗方法,这可能会受到人为错误的影响。同时,在文献中,随机模型已经为许多主要疾病开发了。这引起了基于模拟的PM的解决方案,该解决方案使用模拟工具评估了成对的治疗和患者生物特征特征的性能,并基于此选择为每个患者特征选择最佳治疗方法。方法论/结果:在这项研究中,我们将基于模拟的决策制定中的排名和选择(R&S)模型扩展到解决PM。患者的生物特征被视为R&S的背景,我们称其为上下文排名和选择(CR&S)。我们考虑了CR&S的两种配方,分别具有小和大的上下文空间,并开发了解决它们并确定最佳预算分配规则的新技术。基于它们,提出了两种选择算法,可以通过在抽象和现实世界中的一组测试在数值上表现出优质。管理含义:这项研究提供了一种针对PM进行基于模拟决策的系统方法。为了提高可能的情况下的总体决策质量,应该将更多的模拟工作用于环境,在这种情况下,很难区分最佳治疗方法和非最佳治疗方法,我们的结果量化了对上下文和治疗对之间的模拟工作的最佳权衡。
Problem definition: Personalized medicine (PM) seeks the best treatment for each patient among a set of available treatment methods. Since a specific treatment does not work well on all patients, traditionally, the best treatment was selected based on the doctor's personal experience and expertise, which is subject to human errors. In the meantime, stochastic models have been well developed in the literature for a lot of major diseases. This gives rise to a simulation-based solution for PM, which uses the simulation tool to evaluate the performance for pairs of treatment and patient biometric characteristics, and based on that, selects the best treatment for each patient characteristics. Methodology/results: In this research, we extend the ranking and selection (R&S) model in simulation-based decision making to solving PM. The biometric characteristics of a patient is treated as a context for R&S, and we call it contextual ranking and selection (CR&S). We consider two formulations of CR&S with small and large context spaces respectively and develop new techniques for solving them and identifying the rate-optimal budget allocation rules. Based on them, two selection algorithms are proposed, which can be shown to be numerically superior via a set of tests on abstract and real-world examples. Managerial implications: This research provides a systematic way of conducting simulation-based decision-making for PM. To improve the overall decision quality for the possible contexts, more simulation efforts should be devoted to contexts in which it is difficult to distinguish between the best treatment and non-best treatments, and our results quantify the optimal tradeoff of the simulation efforts between the pairs of contexts and treatments.