论文标题

AI功能的谬误

The Fallacy of AI Functionality

论文作者

Raji, Inioluwa Deborah, Kumar, I. Elizabeth, Horowitz, Aaron, Selbst, Andrew D.

论文摘要

部署的AI系统通常不起作用。它们可以随意地构造,不加选择地部署并欺骗性地促进。然而,尽管存在这种现实,但学者,新闻界和决策者对功能的关注很少。这导致技术和政策解决方案的重点是“道德”或价值一致的部署,经常跳过先前的问题,即给定系统功能或完全提供任何好处。为了描述各种功能失败的危害,我们分析了一组案例研究,以创建已知的AI功能问题的分类法。然后,我们指出的是政策和组织响应,这些政策和组织响应通常被忽略,一旦功能焦点就变得更容易获得。我们认为功能是一项有意义的AI政策挑战,是保护受影响社区免受算法伤害的必要第一步。

Deployed AI systems often do not work. They can be constructed haphazardly, deployed indiscriminately, and promoted deceptively. However, despite this reality, scholars, the press, and policymakers pay too little attention to functionality. This leads to technical and policy solutions focused on "ethical" or value-aligned deployments, often skipping over the prior question of whether a given system functions, or provides any benefits at all. To describe the harms of various types of functionality failures, we analyze a set of case studies to create a taxonomy of known AI functionality issues. We then point to policy and organizational responses that are often overlooked and become more readily available once functionality is drawn into focus. We argue that functionality is a meaningful AI policy challenge, operating as a necessary first step towards protecting affected communities from algorithmic harm.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源