论文标题
使用POD降低订单模型评估气候变化下的墙壁能效设计
Assessing the wall energy efficiency design under climate change using POD reduced order model
论文作者
论文摘要
在环境环境中,数值建模是评估建筑物能源效率的一种有前途的方法。需要设计弹性建筑物,并能够适应未来的极端热量。需要模拟,假设通过墙壁的一维传热问题和几年的模拟范围(接近30)。与此类建模相关的计算成本非常重要,并且值得研究的模型减少方法。目的是为此类长期模拟提出可靠的减少阶模型。为此,研究了一种替代模型减少方法,假设已知的正交分解缩短了时间的基础,而不是像往常一样。该模型在\ textsc {grassmann}歧管的切线空间上使用基础插值启用了计算参数解决方案。考虑了三种研究案例来验证\ revision {yduced-order}模型的效率。结果表明,与参考解决方案相比,该模型的精度为$ 10^{\, - 3} \,$。最后一个案例研究的重点是根据气候变化在\ revision {四维}参数空间下的壁效效率设计。后者由负载材料发射率,热容量,导热率和厚度绝缘层组成。考虑到气候变化,模拟的$ 30 $年限。与标准方法相比,该解决方案最小化墙壁工作速率的计算比率为$ 0.1 \%$。
Within the environmental context, numerical modeling is a promising approach to assessing the energy efficiency of buildings. Resilient buildings need to be designed, and capable of adapting to future extreme heat. Simulations are required assuming a one-dimensional heat transfer problem through walls and a simulation horizon of several years (nearly 30). The computational cost associated with such modeling is quite significant and model reduction methods are worth investigating. The objective is to propose a reliable reduced-order model for such long-term simulations. For this, an alternative model reduction approach is investigated, assuming a known Proper Orthogonal Decomposition reduced basis for time, and not for space as usual. The model enables computing parametric solutions using basis interpolation on the tangent space of the \textsc{Grassmann} manifold. Three study cases are considered to verify the efficiency of the \revision{reduced-order} model. Results highlight that the model has a satisfying accuracy of $10^{\,-3}\,$ compared to reference solutions. The last case study focuses on the wall energy efficiency design under climate change according to a \revision{four-dimensional} parameter space. The latter is composed of the load material emissivity, heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and thickness insulation layer. Simulations are carried over $30$ years considering climate change. The solution minimizing the wall work rate is determined with a computational ratio of $0.1\%$ compared to standard approaches.