论文标题

有限的战略推理解释了多代理市场游戏中的危机出现

Bounded strategic reasoning explains crisis emergence in multi-agent market games

论文作者

Evans, Benjamin Patrick, Prokopenko, Mikhail

论文摘要

基于合理期望和市场均衡的有效市场假设(EMH)是对经济市场进行建模的主要观点。但是,对EMH的最著名的批评是在没有任何重要外部新闻的情况下无法对不平衡行为进行模拟。当这种动态内源性出现时,传统的经济框架对这种行为和与平衡的偏差没有任何解释。这项工作提供了一种替代视角,解释了基于有界理性剂的稳定性分配外部动力学的内源性出现。在简洁的市场入口游戏中,我们展示了有限理性的战略推理会导致内源性新兴危机,并在“返回”中表现出胖尾巴。我们还展示了由于代理多样性(或缺乏代理商的多样性)以及各个代理商的学习更新,如何解释其他常见的经济市场风格化事实,例如聚集的波动性。这项工作解释了在没有任何外部新闻的情况下,经济市场中的各种风格化事实和危机的出现纯粹基于代理人的互动和有限的理性推理。

The efficient market hypothesis (EMH), based on rational expectations and market equilibrium, is the dominant perspective for modelling economic markets. However, the most notable critique of the EMH is the inability to model periods of out-of-equilibrium behaviour in the absence of any significant external news. When such dynamics emerge endogenously, the traditional economic frameworks provide no explanation for such behaviour and the deviation from equilibrium. This work offers an alternate perspective explaining the endogenous emergence of punctuated out-of-equilibrium dynamics based on bounded rational agents. In a concise market entrance game, we show how boundedly rational strategic reasoning can lead to endogenously emerging crises, exhibiting fat tails in "returns". We also show how other common stylised facts of economic markets, such as clustered volatility, can be explained due to agent diversity (or lack thereof) and the varying learning updates across the agents. This work explains various stylised facts and crisis emergence in economic markets, in the absence of any external news, based purely on agent interactions and bounded rational reasoning.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源