论文标题

银河系和质量组件(GAMA):红移空间中的星系组相关与光晕流模型

Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): Probing galaxy-group correlations in redshift space with the halo streaming model

论文作者

Hang, Qianjun, Peacock, John A., Alam, Shadab, Cai, Yan-Chuan, Kraljic, Katarina, van Daalen, Marcel, Bilicki, M., Holwerda, B. W., Loveday, J.

论文摘要

我们已经研究了银河系和大众组装(GAMA)调查的红移空间中的银河系互相关。我们使用一组模拟GAMA星系和组目录来开发和测试一种新颖的“光晕流”模型,以用于红移空间畸变。这通过流媒体模型处理了2个HALO的相关性,以及从模拟物中得出的经验1-HALO项,从而可以准确地建模到非线性制度中。为了探测从红移空间扭曲中推断出的生长速率的稳健性,我们按颜色将星系划分,并根据其总恒星质量分裂,通过重力透镜校准了总质量。我们适合我们的模型相关数据,以获得扰动增长率的估计,$fσ_8$,通过不同模拟实现之间的分散来验证参数错误。在模拟和真实数据中,我们证明了组和星系种群不同子集之间的结果是紧密一致的,考虑到将相关数据降至一定的最小投影半径,$ r _ {\ rm min} $。对于模拟数据,我们可以使用halo流模型对低于$ r _ {\ rm min} = 5H^{ - 1} $ mpc,发现所有子集都在彼此之间产生的增长率约为3%,并且与真实值一致。对于实际的GAMA数据,结果受宇宙差异的限制:$fσ_8= 0.29 \ pm 0.10 $,有效的红移为0.20;但是,有充分的理由可以期望这种方法会从相同类型的较大数据集(例如Desi Bright Galaxy调查)中产生精确的约束。

We have studied the galaxy-group cross-correlations in redshift space for the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) Survey. We use a set of mock GAMA galaxy and group catalogues to develop and test a novel 'halo streaming' model for redshift-space distortions. This treats 2-halo correlations via the streaming model, plus an empirical 1-halo term derived from the mocks, allowing accurate modelling into the nonlinear regime. In order to probe the robustness of the growth rate inferred from redshift-space distortions, we divide galaxies by colour, and divide groups according to their total stellar mass, calibrated to total mass via gravitational lensing. We fit our model to correlation data, to obtain estimates of the perturbation growth rate, $fσ_8$, validating parameter errors via the dispersion between different mock realizations. In both mocks and real data, we demonstrate that the results are closely consistent between different subsets of the group and galaxy populations, considering the use of correlation data down to some minimum projected radius, $r_{\rm min}$. For the mock data, we can use the halo streaming model to below $r_{\rm min} = 5h^{-1}$ Mpc, finding that all subsets yield growth rates within about 3% of each other, and consistent with the true value. For the actual GAMA data, the results are limited by cosmic variance: $fσ_8=0.29\pm 0.10$ at an effective redshift of 0.20; but there is every reason to expect that this method will yield precise constraints from larger datasets of the same type, such as the DESI bright galaxy survey.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源