论文标题

重复的FRB 20200120E在M81球状群集中发生的暴风雨

A burst storm from the repeating FRB 20200120E in an M81 globular cluster

论文作者

Nimmo, K., Hessels, J. W. T., Snelders, M. P., Karuppusamy, R., Hewitt, D. M., Kirsten, F., Marcote, B., Bach, U., Bansod, A., Barr, E. D., Behrend, J., Bezrukovs, V., Buttaccio, S., Feiler, R., Gawroński, M. P., Lindqvist, M., Orbidans, A., Puchalska, W., Wang, N., Winchen, T., Wolak, P., Wu, J., Yuan, J.

论文摘要

重复的快速无线电爆发(FRB)源FRB 20200120E由于其靠近并与球形簇的关联而非常出色。在这里,我们报告以1.4 GHz检测到的Effelsberg望远镜检测到60美元的爆发。我们观察到爆发速率的差异很大,并报告了第一个FRB 20200120E“爆发风暴”,那里的源突然变得活跃,53次爆发(Fulence $ \ geq 0.04 $ JY MS)仅在40分钟内发生。我们发现在爆发时间没有严格的周期性,也没有任何证据表明在观察结果之间源活动的周期性。爆发暴风雨显示出陡峭的能量分布(PowerLaw指数$α= 2.39 \ PM0.12 $)和双模式的等待时间分布,log-Normals均值为0.94 $^{+0.07} _ { - 0.06} $ s和23.61 $ s and 23.61 $^{+3.06} _ {+3.06} _ { - 2.71} $ { - 2.71} $ s。我们将这些等待时间分布的峰值分别归因于特征事件时间尺度和伪poisson爆发率。 $ \ sim1 $ s的次要等待时间峰值为$ \ sim50 \ times $ $比$ \ sim24 $ ms的时间表更长。 FRB 20200120E与FRB 20121102A和FRB 20201124a相比,碎屑持续时间和亮度较低。 Lastly, in contrast to FRB 20121102A, which has observed dispersion measure (DM) variations of $Δ{\rm DM} >1$ pc cm$^{-3}$ on month-to-year timescales, we determine that FRB 20200120E's DM has remained stable ($Δ{\rm DM} <0.15$ pc CM $^{ - 3} $)超过$> 10美元。总体而言,FRB 20200120E的观察性特征与其他主动中继器差异化,但目前尚不清楚它在质量上是不同类型的来源。

The repeating fast radio burst (FRB) source FRB 20200120E is exceptional because of its proximity and association with a globular cluster. Here we report $60$ bursts detected with the Effelsberg telescope at 1.4 GHz. We observe large variations in the burst rate, and report the first FRB 20200120E `burst storm', where the source suddenly became active and 53 bursts (fluence $\geq 0.04$ Jy ms) occurred within only 40 minutes. We find no strict periodicity in the burst arrival times, nor any evidence for periodicity in the source's activity between observations. The burst storm shows a steep energy distribution (power-law index $α= 2.39\pm0.12$) and a bi-modal wait-time distribution, with log-normal means of 0.94$^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ s and 23.61$^{+3.06}_{-2.71}$ s. We attribute these wait-time distribution peaks to a characteristic event timescale and pseudo-Poisson burst rate, respectively. The secondary wait-time peak at $\sim1$ s is $\sim50\times$ longer than the $\sim24$ ms timescale seen for both FRB 20121102A and FRB 20201124A -- potentially indicating a larger emission region, or slower burst propagation. FRB 20200120E shows order-of-magnitude lower burst durations and luminosities compared with FRB 20121102A and FRB 20201124A. Lastly, in contrast to FRB 20121102A, which has observed dispersion measure (DM) variations of $Δ{\rm DM} >1$ pc cm$^{-3}$ on month-to-year timescales, we determine that FRB 20200120E's DM has remained stable ($Δ{\rm DM} <0.15$ pc cm$^{-3}$) over $>10$ months. Overall, the observational characteristics of FRB 20200120E deviate quantitatively from other active repeaters, but it is unclear whether it is qualitatively a different type of source.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源