论文标题
镜头星系建模中缺乏方位角自由的后果
Consequences of the lack of azimuthal freedom in the modeling of lensing galaxies
论文作者
论文摘要
巨大的椭圆星系可以显示出偏离纯椭圆形的结构,例如主轴的扭曲或轴比例以半乳化距离的变化。尽管通常没有考虑这些方位角结构而无法实现令人满意的镜头建模,但有关它们对推断镜头参数的影响的问题,尤其是在时间延迟中,因为它们在时间延迟的宇宙学中使用。本文旨在表征这些效果并量化其影响,以考虑变化的现实幅度。我们通过基于两个数据集创建模拟镜头星系来实现这一目标:局部椭圆星系的观察数据以及典型的镜头红移的椭圆星系的流体动力学模拟。然后,我们模拟了具有空间数据质量的镜头系统的图像,并以标准方式对其进行建模,以评估镜头模型中缺乏方位角自由的影响。我们发现,与输入剪切方向相对于输入剪切方向而言,相对于晶状体的参考取向,相对于爱因斯坦半径处的参考方向而言,晶状体的方向最高可容易地吸收在同型晶状体模型中,而剪切最高为20°。另一方面,椭圆度梯度可能会引入大量剪切,可能会影响径向质量模型,因此偏向$ H_0 $,最大为10 km/s/s/mpc。但是,我们发现光是方位角结构的良好示踪剂,这意味着直接成像应该能够诊断其存在。反过来,这意味着在标准建模实践中,如此巨大的偏见不太可能被没有说明。此外,曲折和椭圆度梯度的总体影响平均在人群水平上。对于我们考虑的星系人群,宇宙论的推断仍然没有偏见。
Massive elliptical galaxies can display structures that deviate from a pure elliptical shape, such as a twist of the principal axis or variations in the axis ratio with galactocentric distance. Although satisfactory lens modeling is generally achieved without accounting for these azimuthal structures, the question about their impact on inferred lens parameters remains, in particular, on time delays as they are used in time-delay cosmography. This paper aims at characterizing these effects and quantifying their impact considering realistic amplitudes of the variations. We achieved this goal by creating mock lensing galaxies with morphologies based on two data sets: observational data of local elliptical galaxies, and hydrodynamical simulations of elliptical galaxies at a typical lens redshift. We then simulated images of the lensing systems with space-based data quality and modeled them in a standard way to assess the impact of a lack of azimuthal freedom in the lens model. We find that twists in lensing galaxies are easily absorbed in homoeidal lens models by a change in orientation of the lens up to 10° with respect to the reference orientation at the Einstein radius, and of the shear by up to 20° with respect to the input shear orientation. The ellipticity gradients, on the other hand, can introduce a substantial amount of shear that may impact the radial mass model and consequently bias $H_0$, up to 10 km/s/Mpc. However, we find that light is a good tracer of azimuthal structures, meaning that direct imaging should be capable of diagnosing their presence. This in turn implies that such a large bias is unlikely to be unaccounted for in standard modeling practices. Furthermore, the overall impact of twists and ellipticity gradients averages out at a population level. For the galaxy populations we considered, the cosmological inference remains unbiased.