论文标题
在不直接视力的情况下,在灵巧的任务中,合成反射和触觉反馈的效用
The Utility of Synthetic Reflexes and Haptic Feedback for Upper-Limb Prostheses in a Dexterous Task Without Direct Vision
论文作者
论文摘要
使用肌电上限假肢的人通常会严重依赖愿景来完成日常活动。因此,他们在视力超负荷的情况下(例如多任务处理或不可用的照明条件)挣扎。由于触觉反射和触觉引起了LIMB运动协调的指导,因此非注射剂可以轻松完成此类任务。基于这些原则,我们开发并测试了两个新型的假体系统,它们结合了自主控制器,并通过振动或分布压力为用户提供触摸位置的反馈。通过在商业假肢手的fing林上安装自定义的接触式传感器以及拇指上的定制压力传感器,可以实现这些功能。我们将两个系统的性能与标准的肌电假体和肌电假体进行了比较,仅在没有直接视觉的情况下进行的挑选和位置任务中的自主控制器。这项受试者间研究的40名非公认者参与者的结果表明,在几个任务里程碑中,纤维触及反射与合成反射的结合比标准假体更为有利。此外,与仅合成反射或压力反馈与合成反射相比,纤维曲折反馈和合成反射改善了掌握位置。这些结果表明,自主控制器和触觉反馈都促进了无视力的灵活任务的成功,并且触觉显示的类型很重要。
Individuals who use myoelectric upper-limb prostheses often rely heavily on vision to complete their daily activities. They thus struggle in situations where vision is overloaded, such as multitasking, or unavailable, such as poor lighting conditions. Non-amputees can easily accomplish such tasks due to tactile reflexes and haptic sensation guiding their upper-limb motor coordination. Based on these principles, we developed and tested two novel prosthesis systems that incorporate autonomous controllers and provide the user with touch-location feedback through either vibration or distributed pressure. These capabilities were made possible by installing a custom contact-location sensor on thefingers of a commercial prosthetic hand, along with a custom pressure sensor on the thumb. We compared the performance of the two systems against a standard myoelectric prosthesis and a myoelectric prosthesis with only autonomous controllers in a difficult reach-to-pick-and-place task conducted without direct vision. Results from 40 non-amputee participants in this between-subjects study indicated that vibrotactile feedback combined with synthetic reflexes proved significantly more advantageous than the standard prosthesis in several of the task milestones. In addition, vibrotactile feedback and synthetic reflexes improved grasp placement compared to only synthetic reflexes or pressure feedback combined with synthetic reflexes. These results indicate that both autonomous controllers and haptic feedback facilitate success in dexterous tasks without vision, and that the type of haptic display matters.