论文标题

比较砖块和黑屋项目以支持智能建筑应用程序

Comparison of Brick and Project Haystack to Support Smart Building Applications

论文作者

Quinn, Caroline, McArthur, J. J.

论文摘要

通过智能建筑应用程序启用建筑物将有助于实现建筑物的持续有效调试,最终以最低成本在能源使用方面达到高峰性能,并提高乘员健康和舒适性。对于这些技术,必须采用可扩展的数据本体,以通过构建机械系统生成的语义表示数据,并充当与智能建筑应用程序连接的渠道。行业和学术界发现的Brick and Project Haystack本体的生存能力促使了使用与行业本体论作为基准的案例研究对完整性和表现力进行定量比较。此外,使用文献中概述的关键本体论素质完成了定性比较。根据结果​​提出砖的建议。砖在完整性和表达性方面的评估值分别达到了59%和100%,而Haystacks则达到43%和96%。此外,布里克(Brick)表现出六个理想的品质中的五个,海斯塔克只展示了三个。适当的本体论的建议构成了长期智能建筑应用程序开发的基础,该基础将支持跨规模的建筑运营以及下一代建筑控制和自动化策略的创新方法。

Enabling buildings with Smart Building applications will help to achieve the ongoing efficient commissioning of buildings, ultimately attaining peak performance in energy use and improved occupant health and comfort, at minimum cost. For these technologies to be scalable data ontology must be adopted to semantically represent data generated by building mechanical systems, acting as conduit for connection to Smart Building applications. The viability of Brick and Project Haystack ontologies, as found by industry and academia, prompted a quantitative comparison of completeness and expressiveness using a case study with an industry ontology as the baseline. Additionally, a qualitative comparison was completed using key ontology qualities outlined in literature. A recommendation of Brick is made based on results. Brick achieved higher assessment values in completeness and expressiveness achieving 59% and 100% respectively, as compared to Haystacks 43% and 96%. Additionally, Brick exhibited five of six desirable qualities, where Haystack exhibited only three. The recommendation of the appropriate ontology forms the basis for longer-term Smart Building application development, which will support innovative approaches to sustainability in building operations across scale, as well as next-generation building controls and automation strategies.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源