论文标题
旋转纳米碳晶粒:异常微波发射的可行起源
Spinning nano-carbon grains: Viable origin for anomalous microwave emission
论文作者
论文摘要
语境。现在以银河系常规检测到过多的微波发射,通常称为异常微波发射(AME)。尽管它与星际(碳质)纳米粒的旋转的联系似乎在云尺度上已经相对良好,但大规模的观察表明,纳米 - 碳碳和AME的不同示踪剂之间缺乏相关性,这导致社区质疑该链接的稳定性。目标。使用纳米 - 碳和纳米硅酸盐的辅助数据和旋转灰尘模型,我们探索了从银河平面出来的AME的程度可能源于一个或另一个载体。方法。与以前的大规模研究相反,我们的方法不是建立在比较彼此之间的不同尘埃示踪剂的相关性上,而是在比较模型与观察到的相关性的模型预测的差相关性上。这是基于对气体电离状态和谷物电荷尽可能现实的估计,这是局部辐射场和气体密度的函数。结果。首先,纳米碳灰尘可以解释培养基特性的所有观察结果,这与关于弥漫性星际培养基中冷和温暖中性培养基的分离的最新发现一致。观察值的分散体可以考虑到灰尘尺寸的分布,丰度或电偶极矩的变化。其次,无论我们考虑的纳米硅酸盐灰尘的性能和丰度如何,旋转的纳米硅酸盐都被排除为AME的唯一来源。第三,当考虑到仅旋转纳米 - 碳碳的排放时,就可以获得与观察结果的最佳一致性。但是,只要它们的丰度不超过$ y _ {\ rm si} \ sim 1 \%$,纳米硅酸盐在AME生产中的边际参与就不可排除。
Context. Excess microwave emission, commonly known as anomalous microwave emission (AME), is now routinely detected in the Milky Way. Although its link with the rotation of interstellar (carbonaceous) nano-grains seems to be relatively well established at cloud scales, large-scale observations show a lack of correlation between the different tracers of nano-carbons and AME, which has led the community to question the viability of this link. Aims. Using ancillary data and spinning dust models for nano-carbons and nano-silicates, we explore the extent to which the AME that come out of the Galactic Plane might originate with one or another carrier. Methods. In contrast to previous large-scale studies, our method is not built on comparing the correlations of the different dust tracers with each other, but rather on comparing the poor correlations predicted by the models with observed correlations. This is based on estimates that are as realistic as possible of the gas ionisation state and grain charge as a function of the local radiation field and gas density. Results. First, nano-carbon dust can explain all the observations for medium properties, in agreement with the latest findings about the separation of cold and warm neutral medium in the diffuse interstellar medium. The dispersion in the observations can be accounted for with little variations in the dust size distribution, abundance, or electric dipole moment. Second, regardless of the properties and abundance of the nano-silicate dust we considered, spinning nano-silicates are excluded as the sole source of the AME. Third, the best agreement with the observations is obtained when the emission of spinning nano-carbons alone is taken into account. However, a marginal participation of nano-silicates in AME production cannot be excluded as long as their abundance does not exceed $Y_{\rm Si} \sim 1\%$.