论文标题
EPASAD:基于椭圆形决策边界的过程感知隐形攻击探测器
EPASAD: Ellipsoid decision boundary based Process-Aware Stealthy Attack Detector
论文作者
论文摘要
由于关键基础设施(CI)在一个国家的经济中的重要性,因此它们是网络攻击者的利润目标。这些关键的基础设施通常是网络物理系统(CPS),例如电网,水和污水处理设施,石油和天然气管道等。最近,这些系统已经遭受了无数次网络攻击。研究人员一直在为CIS开发网络安全解决方案,以避免持久损害。根据标准框架,基于识别,保护,检测,响应和恢复的网络安全是这些研究的核心。检测正在进行的攻击,该攻击逃脱了标准保护,例如防火墙,防病毒和宿主/网络入侵检测,随着这种攻击最终会影响系统的物理动态,因此变得重要。因此,物理动力学中的异常检测证明了一种有效的方法来实施深度防御。 PASAD是传感器/执行器数据中异常检测的一个例子,代表了此类系统的物理动力学。我们提出了Epasad,该Epasad改善了PASAD中用于检测这些微观攻击的检测技术,因为我们的实验表明PASAD的基于球形边界的检测未能检测。我们的方法Epasad通过使用椭圆形边界来克服这一点,从而在各个维度上收紧边界,而球形边界则平等地对待所有维度。我们使用Te-Process Simulator和C-Town数据集生成的数据集验证Epasad。结果表明,Epasad分别将PASAD的平均召回率分别提高了5.8%和9.5%。
Due to the importance of Critical Infrastructure (CI) in a nation's economy, they have been lucrative targets for cyber attackers. These critical infrastructures are usually Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) such as power grids, water, and sewage treatment facilities, oil and gas pipelines, etc. In recent times, these systems have suffered from cyber attacks numerous times. Researchers have been developing cyber security solutions for CIs to avoid lasting damages. According to standard frameworks, cyber security based on identification, protection, detection, response, and recovery are at the core of these research. Detection of an ongoing attack that escapes standard protection such as firewall, anti-virus, and host/network intrusion detection has gained importance as such attacks eventually affect the physical dynamics of the system. Therefore, anomaly detection in physical dynamics proves an effective means to implement defense-in-depth. PASAD is one example of anomaly detection in the sensor/actuator data, representing such systems' physical dynamics. We present EPASAD, which improves the detection technique used in PASAD to detect these micro-stealthy attacks, as our experiments show that PASAD's spherical boundary-based detection fails to detect. Our method EPASAD overcomes this by using Ellipsoid boundaries, thereby tightening the boundaries in various dimensions, whereas a spherical boundary treats all dimensions equally. We validate EPASAD using the dataset produced by the TE-process simulator and the C-town datasets. The results show that EPASAD improves PASAD's average recall by 5.8% and 9.5% for the two datasets, respectively.