论文标题
他们接受还是抵制网络安全措施？ 13项安全态度清单的开发和验证（SA-13）
Do They Accept or Resist Cybersecurity Measures? Development and Validation of the 13-Item Security Attitude Inventory (SA-13)
论文作者
论文摘要
我们提出SA-13，这是13项安全态度清单。我们通过进行探索性因素分析，验证性因素分析和其他测试，并通过美国人口普查加权Qualtrics Panel（n = 209）进行数据来开发和验证对网络安全态度的评估。我们的SA-13库存超出了与安全措施（SA-参与度，三个项目）和对安全措施的关注（SA牵键，三个项目）的核心六个指标，还增加了对安全措施（SA耐药性，四个项目）的抵抗指标，并关注对提高合规性（SA结局（SA结局，三项，三项））的关注。 SA-13和分量表具有理想的心理测量品质； SA-13以及SA的参与性和SA-Intertentys子量表的得分较高，与更高的安全行为意图和自我报告的最新安全行为相关。 SA-13和子量表对需要轻量级调查的研究人员和安全意识团队很有用。 13个指标的综合评分提供了对网络安全决策平衡的紧凑度量。
We present SA-13, the 13-item Security Attitude inventory. We develop and validate this assessment of cybersecurity attitudes by conducting an exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and other tests with data from a U.S. Census-weighted Qualtrics panel (N=209). Beyond a core six indicators of Engagement with Security Measures (SA-Engagement, three items) and Attentiveness to Security Measures (SA-Attentiveness, three items), our SA-13 inventory adds indicators of Resistance to Security Measures (SA-Resistance, four items) and Concernedness with Improving Compliance (SA-Concernedness, three items). SA-13 and the subscales exhibit desirable psychometric qualities; and higher scores on SA-13 and on the SA-Engagement and SA-Attentiveness subscales are associated with higher scores for security behavior intention and for self-reported recent security behaviors. SA-13 and the subscales are useful for researchers and security awareness teams who need a lightweight survey measure of user security attitudes. The composite score of the 13 indicators provides a compact measurement of cybersecurity decisional balance.
