论文标题
道德辩论者：关于道德框架论点的计算产生的研究
The Moral Debater: A Study on the Computational Generation of Morally Framed Arguments
论文作者
论文摘要
观众先前的信念和道德是有力的指标，表明他们会受到给定论点影响的可能性。利用这种知识可以帮助集中精力共享价值，以使各方达成协议。但是，在论证技术中，到目前为止，这几乎没有被利用。本文研究了自动产生道德框架论点及其对不同受众的影响的可行性。遵循道德基金会理论，我们提出了一个有效产生专注于不同道德的论点的系统。在深入的用户研究中，我们要求自由主义者和保守派评估这些论点的影响。我们的结果表明，尤其是在对先前的信念受到挑战时，听众会受到道德上构想的论点的影响。
An audience's prior beliefs and morals are strong indicators of how likely they will be affected by a given argument. Utilizing such knowledge can help focus on shared values to bring disagreeing parties towards agreement. In argumentation technology, however, this is barely exploited so far. This paper studies the feasibility of automatically generating morally framed arguments as well as their effect on different audiences. Following the moral foundation theory, we propose a system that effectively generates arguments focusing on different morals. In an in-depth user study, we ask liberals and conservatives to evaluate the impact of these arguments. Our results suggest that, particularly when prior beliefs are challenged, an audience becomes more affected by morally framed arguments.
