论文标题
最近的几弹对象检测算法:具有性能比较的调查
Recent Few-Shot Object Detection Algorithms: A Survey with Performance Comparison
论文作者
论文摘要
最近的深层神经网络成功地解决了通用的对象检测(上帝)任务,该网络受到一些普通班的注释培训样本的雪崩训练。但是,将这些对象探测器概括为新型长尾对象类,这些对象探测器只有很少的标记训练样本仍然是不乏味的。为此,少数几个对象检测(FSOD)最近是主题,因为它模仿了人类学习学习的能力,并智能地将学习的通用对象知识从共同的重尾转移到了新颖的长尾对象类。尤其是,近年来,该研究的研究一直在蓬勃发展,并提出了各种基准,骨架和方法。为了审查这些FSOD作品,有一些有见地的FSOD调查文章[58,59,74,78],它们系统地研究并将其作为微调/转移学习和元学习方法进行比较。相比之下,我们根据新的分类法的新角度回顾了现有的FSOD算法,该算法基于它们的贡献,即面向数据,面向模型和面向算法。因此,对FSOD的最新成就进行了全面的调查。此外,我们还分析了这些方法的技术挑战,优点和缺点,并设想了FSOD的未来方向。具体来说,我们概述了FSOD,包括问题定义,常见数据集和评估协议。然后提出分类法将FSOD方法分为三种类型。在此分类法之后,我们对FSOD的进步进行系统的审查。最后,提出了有关绩效,挑战和未来方向的进一步讨论。
The generic object detection (GOD) task has been successfully tackled by recent deep neural networks, trained by an avalanche of annotated training samples from some common classes. However, it is still non-trivial to generalize these object detectors to the novel long-tailed object classes, which have only few labeled training samples. To this end, the Few-Shot Object Detection (FSOD) has been topical recently, as it mimics the humans' ability of learning to learn, and intelligently transfers the learned generic object knowledge from the common heavy-tailed, to the novel long-tailed object classes. Especially, the research in this emerging field has been flourishing in recent years with various benchmarks, backbones, and methodologies proposed. To review these FSOD works, there are several insightful FSOD survey articles [58, 59, 74, 78] that systematically study and compare them as the groups of fine-tuning/transfer learning, and meta-learning methods. In contrast, we review the existing FSOD algorithms from a new perspective under a new taxonomy based on their contributions, i.e., data-oriented, model-oriented, and algorithm-oriented. Thus, a comprehensive survey with performance comparison is conducted on recent achievements of FSOD. Furthermore, we also analyze the technical challenges, the merits and demerits of these methods, and envision the future directions of FSOD. Specifically, we give an overview of FSOD, including the problem definition, common datasets, and evaluation protocols. The taxonomy is then proposed that groups FSOD methods into three types. Following this taxonomy, we provide a systematic review of the advances in FSOD. Finally, further discussions on performance, challenges, and future directions are presented.