论文标题

优先算法,并提供有关差异路径分配问题的建议

Priority Algorithms with Advice for Disjoint Path Allocation Problems

论文作者

Böckenhauer, Hans-Joachim, Frei, Fabian, Horvath, Silvan

论文摘要

我们在优先级框架中分析了不相交路径分配问题(DPA)。由通信网络中的流量调节问题激发,DPA包括在图中分配边缘 - 偶口路径。尽管过去已经对DPA的在线算法进行了彻底的研究,但我们通过考虑更强大的优先算法算法来扩展对此优化问题的分析。像在线算法一样,优先算法仅依次收到其输入,并且必须对单个输入项目输出不可撤销的决策,然后才能完整地看到输入。但是,与在线设置相反,优先算法可以在所有可能的输入项目的集合上选择订单,然后根据此顺序显示实际输入。优先算法是贪婪算法的直觉概念的自然模型。除了分析经典的优先级设置外,我们还考虑了优先算法的建议。最初想从信息理论的角度研究在线算法,建议的概念最近扩展到了优先级框架。在本文中,我们分析了路径图类别的DPA问题的经典变体,长度加权DPA的相关问题,最后是在树的图类别上的DPA。我们在LWDPA最佳的建议上显示了渐近匹配的上限和下限,并概括了DPA的已知最佳性结果,最多3的树木的途径。在最大程度大于3的树木上,我们证明了与咨询率的近似值相匹配的最大程度匹配。最后,我们介绍了在此类树上实现最佳性所需的建议和下限。

We analyze the Disjoint Path Allocation problem (DPA) in the priority framework. Motivated by the problem of traffic regulation in communication networks, DPA consists of allocating edge-disjoint paths in a graph. While online algorithms for DPA have been thoroughly studied in the past, we extend the analysis of this optimization problem by considering the more powerful class of priority algorithms. Like an online algorithm, a priority algorithm receives its input only sequentially and must output irrevocable decisions for individual input items before having seen the input in its entirety. However, in contrast to the online setting, a priority algorithm may choose an order on the set of all possible input items and the actual input is then presented according to this order. A priority algorithm is a natural model for the intuitively well-understood concept of a greedy algorithm. Apart from analyzing the classical priority setting, we also consider priority algorithms with advice. Originally conceived to study online algorithms from an information-theoretic point of view, the concept of advice has recently been extended to the priority framework. In this paper, we analyze the classical variant of the DPA problem on the graph class of paths, the related problem of Length-Weighted DPA, and finally, DPA on the graph class of trees. We show asymptotically matching upper and lower bounds on the advice necessary for optimality in LWDPA and generalize the known optimality result for DPA on paths to trees with maximal degree at most 3. On trees with maximal degree greater than 3, we prove matching upper and lower bounds on the approximation ratio in the advice-free priority setting. Finally, we present upper and lower bounds on the advice necessary to achieve optimality on such trees.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源