论文标题
UX关于对话人类互动的研究:ACM数字图书馆的文献综述
UX Research on Conversational Human-AI Interaction: A Literature Review of the ACM Digital Library
论文作者
论文摘要
早期的对话剂(CAS)着重于人与CAS之间的二元人类相互作用,随后是多腺性人类相互作用的日益普及,其中CAS旨在介导人类人类的相互作用。用于多边形相互作用的CAS是独一无二的,因为它们涵盖了混合社会互动,即人-CA,人对人类和人类对群体的行为。但是,对多核CAS的研究散布在不同的领域,使识别,比较和积累现有知识的挑战。为了促进CA系统的未来设计,我们对ACM出版物进行了文献综述,并确定了进行UX(用户体验)研究的一组作品。我们定性地合成了多核CAS的影响,分为人类相互作用的四个方面,即沟通,参与,联系和关系维持。通过对选定的多核和二元CA研究的混合方法分析,我们开发了一系列对效果的评估测量值。我们的发现表明,通过社会界限(例如隐私,披露和身份)设计对道德多边形CAS至关重要。未来的研究还应推进对会话AI的可用性测试方法和信任建设指南。
Early conversational agents (CAs) focused on dyadic human-AI interaction between humans and the CAs, followed by the increasing popularity of polyadic human-AI interaction, in which CAs are designed to mediate human-human interactions. CAs for polyadic interactions are unique because they encompass hybrid social interactions, i.e., human-CA, human-to-human, and human-to-group behaviors. However, research on polyadic CAs is scattered across different fields, making it challenging to identify, compare, and accumulate existing knowledge. To promote the future design of CA systems, we conducted a literature review of ACM publications and identified a set of works that conducted UX (user experience) research. We qualitatively synthesized the effects of polyadic CAs into four aspects of human-human interactions, i.e., communication, engagement, connection, and relationship maintenance. Through a mixed-method analysis of the selected polyadic and dyadic CA studies, we developed a suite of evaluation measurements on the effects. Our findings show that designing with social boundaries, such as privacy, disclosure, and identification, is crucial for ethical polyadic CAs. Future research should also advance usability testing methods and trust-building guidelines for conversational AI.