论文标题
银河系和SMC大型恒星的风质:CMFGEN模型的经验Z依赖性
Wind properties of Milky Way and SMC massive stars: empirical Z dependence from CMFGEN models
论文作者
论文摘要
关于不同金属性下的恒星风和进化的详细知识对于理解当地星系及其他地区的恒星种群和反馈至关重要。尽管文献上的努力,我们仍然缺乏对金属性($ z $)依赖性的全面,经验的看法。在这里,我们以银河系(MW)和小麦哲伦云(SMC)的方式调查了O和B恒星的风。我们收集了通过NLTE代码CMFGEN分析的96颗恒星样品。我们探索了他们的风强度和终端速度,以解决$ z $的依赖性,这是在较大的亮度范围内。经验风光关系(WLR)获得了更新,并扩展了文献中的先前结果。它揭示了与辐射驱动的风理论一致的光度和$ z $依赖性。对于明亮对象($ \ log l/l_ \ odot \ gtrsim 5.4 $),我们推断出$ \ dot {m} \ sim z^{0.5-0.8} $。但是,这种依赖性似乎在较低的亮度下变得较弱或消失。对终端速度的分析表明,具有$ n \ sim 0.1-0.2 $的浅$ z^n $依赖性,但应使用更大的样本和更准确的$ v _ {\ infty} $确定确认。基于POWR代码的SMC恒星的最新结果支持我们推断的WLR。另一方面,最近的弓箭测量值主要位于我们派生的WLR上方。 WLR的理论计算并不精确,特别是在低$ l $的情况下,结果分散。我们的结果与最新预测之间的偏差被认为是由于风力问题和模型预测的极端终端速度所致。鉴于其天体物理的意义,我们的分析提出的Z依赖性值得进一步研究。
Detailed knowledge about stellar winds and evolution at different metallicities is crucial for understanding stellar populations and feedback in the Local Group of galaxies and beyond. Despite efforts in the literature, we still lack a comprehensive, empirical view of the dependence of wind properties on metallicity ($Z$). Here, we investigate the winds of O and B stars in the Milky Way (MW) and Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). We gathered a sample of 96 stars analyzed by means of the NLTE code CMFGEN. We explored their wind strengths and terminal velocities to address the $Z$ dependence, over a large luminosity range. The empirical wind-luminosity relation (WLR) obtained updates and extends previous results in the literature. It reveals a luminosity and $Z$ dependence, in agreement with the radiatively driven wind theory. For bright objects ($\log L/L_\odot \gtrsim 5.4$), we infer that $\dot{M} \sim Z^{0.5-0.8}$. However, this dependence seems to get weaker or vanish at lower luminosities. The analysis of the terminal velocities suggests a shallow $Z^n$ dependence, with $n \sim 0.1-0.2$, but it should be confirmed with a larger sample and more accurate $V_{\infty}$ determinations. Recent results on SMC stars based on the PoWR code support our inferred WLR. On the other hand, recent bow-shocks measurements stand mostly above our derived WLR. Theoretical calculations of the WLR are not precise, specially at low $L$, where the results scatter. Deviations between our results and recent predictions are identified to be due to the weak wind problem and the extreme terminal velocities predicted by the models. The Z dependence suggested by our analysis deserves further investigations, given its astrophysical implications.