论文标题

对无定形聚乙烯热传输计算的所有原子和联合原子模型的比较

Comparison of all atom and united atom models for thermal transport calculations of amorphous polyethylene

论文作者

Wu, James, Mukherji, Debashish

论文摘要

聚合物模拟通常采用具有不同分子分辨率的模型。联合原子(UA)模型就是这样的一个例子,其中分子中某些原子的组聚集成超级原子。尽管它们的计算简单性使它们在研究广泛的聚合物特性方面特别有吸引力,但UA模型中缺少的自由度可能会影响与局部振动密切相关的某些特性,例如热容量和热传输系数$κ$。相反,数值耗尽所有原子(AA)模型会产生更好的实验数据的结果。在这项工作中,我们系统地研究并比较了从AA和无定形聚乙烯系统的UA模型获得的$κ$。结果表明,UA描述可能不是评估热传输的合适模型,因为与AA描述和实验值相比,它低估了$κ$。粗粒胶导致柔和的相互作用及其存在在UA模型的机械响应较弱的情况下突出显示,因此也低估了$κ$。我们通过在单链能量传输模型的框架内提取键和$κ$的债券贡献来进一步巩固我们的发现。

Polymer simulations routinely employ models with different molecular resolutions. United atom (UA) models are one such example, where groups of certain atoms in a molecule are clustered into superatoms. Although their computational simplicity makes them particularly attractive for studying a wide range of polymer properties, the missing degrees of freedom in UA models can impact certain properties that are intimately linked to localized vibrations, such as the heat capacity and the thermal transport coefficient $κ$. In contrast, the numerically exhausting all atom (AA) models produce results that better match experimental data. In this work, we systematically investigate and compare $κ$ obtained from an AA and a UA models for an amorphous polyethylene system. The results indicate that the UA description may not be a suitable model for evaluating thermal transport, since it underestimates $κ$ in comparison to an AA description and the experimental value. The coarse-graining leads to the softer interactions and its presence is highlighted in a weaker mechanical response from the UA model, thus also underestimates $κ$. We further consolidate our findings by extracting the bonded and the nonbonded contributions to $κ$ within the framework of the single chain energy transfer model.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源