论文标题

标准量子退火优于绝热反向退火

Standard quantum annealing outperforms adiabatic reverse annealing with decoherence

论文作者

Passarelli, Gianluca, Yip, Ka-Wa, Lidar, Daniel A., Lucignano, Procolo

论文摘要

我们在开放系统中研究绝热反向退火(ARA)。在封闭的系统(统一)设置中,该退火协议允许避免选定模型的一阶量子相变,与标准量子退火相比,导致指数加速,前提是该算法的初始状态在与目标一个目标的竖琴距离处接近。在这里,我们表明,破坏性可以显着修改以下结论:通过诉诸绝热的主方程方法,我们模拟了铁磁性$ p $ -spin模型的动力学,并在独立和集体倾向下使用$ p = 3 $。对于这两种破坏性模型,我们都表明,开放系统ARA的性能对初始状态的选择要比其单一状态敏感得多,并且最重要的是,与标准量子退火相比,开放系统ARA和大大损失了解决方案优势的时间。这些结果表明,作为一种独立的策略,ARA不太可能在实验上超过标准“向前”量子退火,并且可能需要采取这种错误缓解策略,以实现在现实,嘈杂的环境中实现ARA的好处。

We study adiabatic reverse annealing (ARA) in an open system. In the closed system (unitary) setting, this annealing protocol allows avoidance of first-order quantum phase transitions of selected models, resulting in an exponential speedup compared with standard quantum annealing, provided that the initial state of the algorithm is close in Hamming distance to the target one. Here, we show that decoherence can significantly modify this conclusion: by resorting to the adiabatic master equation approach, we simulate the dynamics of the ferromagnetic $p$-spin model with $p=3$ under independent and collective dephasing. For both models of decoherence, we show that the performance of open system ARA is far less sensitive to the choice of the initial state than its unitary counterpart, and, most significantly, that open system ARA by and large loses its time to solution advantage compared to standard quantum annealing. These results suggest that as a stand-alone strategy, ARA is unlikely to experimentally outperform standard "forward" quantum annealing, and that error mitigation strategies will likely be required in order to realize the benefits of ARA in realistic, noisy settings.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源