论文标题

伽马射线爆发的紧密三参数相关性和相关分类

A Tight Three-parameter Correlation and Related Classification on Gamma-Ray Bursts

论文作者

Zhang, Shuai, Shao, Lang, Zhang, Bin-Bin, Zou, Jin-Hang, Sun, Hai-Yuan, Yao, Yu-Jie, Li, Lin-Lin

论文摘要

伽马射线爆发(GRB)被广泛认为来自巨大的折叠和/或紧凑的二进制合并,因此,它们将分别产生长和短的GRB。鉴于我们可以使用越来越多的观察数据,有关此分类方案的详细信息一直存在于持续的辩论中。在这项工作中,我们将一系列数据挖掘方法应用于研究Fermi Gamma-ray爆发监视器检测到的GRB迅速排放中的潜在分类信息。在Vuly($ F $),峰值通量($ F $)和及时持续时间($ t_ {90} $)之间发现紧密的全局相关性,该持续时间($ t_ {90} $)采用$ \ log {\ it f} = 0.75 \ log t_ {90} +0.92 +0.92 \ log f -log f -7.14 $。基于此相关性,我们可以定义一个新参数$ l = 1.66 \ log t_ {90} + 0.84 \ log {\ it f} - 0.46 \ log log f + 3.24 $通过线性判别分析,该分析可以区分长和短的grb,而比$ t_ {90} $更少的含糊不清。我们还讨论了基于高斯混合模型的簇分析的GRB分类的三个子类方案,并建议除了SGRB之外,LGRB可以分为长期的伽玛射线爆发(LBGRB)和长期伽马射线爆发(LFGRBS),LBGR具有统计的更高和$ F $ F $ F $ ff $ ff $ ff $ ff $ ff $ f $ ff $ ff $ ff $ ffgr;进一步的统计分析发现,LBGRB的GRB脉冲数量也比LFGRB高。

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are widely believed to be from massive collapsars and/or compact binary mergers, which accordingly, would generate long and short GRBs, respectively. The details on this classification scheme have been in constant debate given more and more observational data available to us. In this work, we apply a series of data mining methods to studying the potential classification information contained in the prompt emission of GRBs detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor. A tight global correlation is found between fluence ($f$), peak flux ($F$) and prompt duration ($T_{90}$) which takes the form of $ \log {\it f}= 0.75 \log T_{90} +0.92 \log F -7.14$. Based on this correlation, we can define a new parameter $L = 1.66\log T_{90} + 0.84 \log {\it f} - 0.46 \log F + 3.24$ by linear discriminant analysis that would distinguish between long and short GRBs with much less ambiguity than $T_{90}$. We also discussed the three subclasses scheme of GRB classification derived from clusters analysis based on a Gaussian mixture model, and suggest that, besides SGRBs, LGRBs may be divided into long-bright gamma-ray bursts (LBGRBs) and long-faint gamma-ray bursts (LFGRBs), LBGRBs have statistical higher $f$ and $F$ than LFGRBs; further statistical analysis found that LBGRBs also have higher number of GRB pulses than LFGRBs.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源