论文标题
比较恒星强度干涉法的不同方法
Comparing Different Approaches for Stellar Intensity Interferometry
论文作者
论文摘要
恒星强度干涉仪将光子在其相干时间内关联,并可以克服现有振幅干涉仪的基线限制。强度干涉仪不依赖光学元件的相相一致性,因此在没有高级光学和光组合延迟线的情况下起作用。但是,与逼真的光滤波器带宽(> 0.1 nm)观察到的星光的相干时间通常比检测系统的时间分辨率(> 10 ps)小得多,从而大大降低了相关信号。在相当短的测量时间内达到高信号可以以不同的方式实现:通过增加时间分辨率,增加相关信号高度或增加光子速率,从而降低测量的统计不确定性。我们提出了采用两种方法的实验室测量,并直接根据信号与噪声比进行比较。将高度分辨率的干涉学设置设计为小型到中间大小的光学望远镜,因此将光子速率(直径<一些米)与能够测量高光子速率的设置进行了比较,该设置计划安装在Cherenkov望远镜上,其直径为> 10 m。我们使用氙气灯作为模拟星光的常见光源。两种设置都测量了预期的相关信号,并在10分钟至23 h之间的测量时间的统计不确定性的预期射击限制下工作。我们讨论了测量结果的定量差异,并概述了每个干涉仪概念的合适操作制度。
Stellar intensity interferometers correlate photons within their coherence time and could overcome the baseline limitations of existing amplitude interferometers. Intensity interferometers do not rely on phase coherence of the optical elements and thus function without high grade optics and light combining delay lines. However, the coherence time of starlight observed with realistic optical filter bandwidths (> 0.1 nm) is usually much smaller than the time resolution of the detection system (> 10 ps), resulting in a greatly reduced correlation signal. Reaching high signal to noise in a reasonably short measurement time can be achieved in different ways: either by increasing the time resolution, which increases the correlation signal height, or by increasing the photon rate, which decreases statistical uncertainties of the measurement. We present laboratory measurements employing both approaches and directly compare them in terms of signal to noise ratio. A high time-resolution interferometry setup designed for small to intermediate size optical telescopes and thus lower photon rates (diameters < some meters) is compared to a setup capable of measuring high photon rates, which is planned to be installed at Cherenkov telescopes with dish diameters of > 10 m. We use a Xenon lamp as a common light source simulating starlight. Both setups measure the expected correlation signal and work at the expected shot-noise limit of statistical uncertainties for measurement times between 10 min and 23 h. We discuss the quantitative differences in the measurement results and give an overview of suitable operation regimes for each of the interferometer concepts.