论文标题
基于转移学习的替代模型,用于纳米流体的热导率
Transfer-learning-based Surrogate Model for Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids
论文作者
论文摘要
自1990年代以来,已经对纳米流体的传热特性进行了广泛的研究。研究调查表明,悬浮纳米颗粒会显着改变悬架的热特性。纳米流体的热导率是通常被认为大于基础流体的特性之一。发现热导率的增加取决于几个参数。已经提出了几种理论来对纳米流体的热导电进行建模,但是尚无可靠的通用理论来对纳米流体的异常导热率进行建模。近年来,已成功采用了受监督的数据驱动方法来创建各种科学学科的替代模型,尤其是用于建模难以理解的现象。这些监督的学习方法使模型可以捕获高度非线性现象。在这项工作中,我们利用了现有的相关性,并同时将它们与可用的实验结果一起使用,以开发更强大的替代模型来预测纳米流体的导热率。使用转移学习方法对人工神经网络进行训练,以预测32种不同颗粒液体组合(8种颗粒材料和4种流体)的球形颗粒的纳米流体的热导率增强。使用相关性产生的大量较低精度数据用于对模型参数进行粗略调整,并且使用有限量的更值得信赖的实验数据用于微调模型参数。将基于转移学习的模型的结果与基线模型的结果进行了比较,这些模型仅使用拟合度量的优点对实验数据进行培训。发现转移学习模型的性能更好,拟合值的优点为0.93,而不是基线模型的0.83。
Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids have been extensively studied since the 1990s. Research investigations show that the suspended nanoparticles significantly alter the suspension's thermal properties. The thermal conductivity of nanofluids is one of the properties that is generally found to be greater than that of the base fluid. This increase in thermal conductivity is found to depend on several parameters. Several theories have been proposed to model the thermal conductivities of nanofluids, but there is no reliable universal theory yet to model the anomalous thermal conductivity of nanofluids. In recent years, supervised data-driven methods have been successfully employed to create surrogate models across various scientific disciplines, especially for modeling difficult-to-understand phenomena. These supervised learning methods allow the models to capture highly non-linear phenomena. In this work, we have taken advantage of existing correlations and used them concurrently with available experimental results to develop more robust surrogate models for predicting the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Artificial neural networks are trained using the transfer learning approach to predict the thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids with spherical particles for 32 different particle-fluid combinations (8 particles materials and 4 fluids). The large amount of lower accuracy data generated from correlations is used to coarse-tune the model parameters, and the limited amount of more trustworthy experimental data is used to fine-tune the model parameters. The transfer learning-based models' results are compared with those from baseline models which are trained only on experimental data using a goodness of fit metric. It is found that the transfer learning models perform better with goodness of fit values of 0.93 as opposed to 0.83 from the baseline models.