论文标题
算法公平行动主义的管理影响
The Managerial Effects of Algorithmic Fairness Activism
论文作者
论文摘要
道德论点如何影响AI在业务中的采用？我们将业务决策者随机暴露于AI公平行动主义中使用的论点。强调算法偏见的不可避免的论点，导致管理者将人类放弃AI的人工审查，并报告对诉讼和负PR的更大期望。即使AI降低性别和种族差异以及解决AI公平性的工程投资是可行的，这些影响仍然存在。强调现状比较会产生相反的影响。我们还测量了“科学贴面”在AI伦理论点中的影响。科学贴面改变了管理行为，但并非不对称地受益（与关键）AI行动主义。
How do ethical arguments affect AI adoption in business? We randomly expose business decision-makers to arguments used in AI fairness activism. Arguments emphasizing the inescapability of algorithmic bias lead managers to abandon AI for manual review by humans and report greater expectations about lawsuits and negative PR. These effects persist even when AI lowers gender and racial disparities and when engineering investments to address AI fairness are feasible. Emphasis on status quo comparisons yields opposite effects. We also measure the effects of "scientific veneer" in AI ethics arguments. Scientific veneer changes managerial behavior but does not asymmetrically benefit favorable (versus critical) AI activism.
