论文标题
使用量子关联内存的粒子轨迹分类
Particle Track Classification Using Quantum Associative Memory
论文作者
论文摘要
通常采用模式识别算法来简化亚原子物理实验中轨道重建的挑战性和必要步骤。在歧视相关相互作用的帮助下,模式识别试图通过隔离感兴趣的信号来加速轨道重建。在高碰撞率实验中,这种算法对于确定是否在将数据传输到磁带之前仍从给定的相互作用中保留或丢弃信息至关重要。随着数据速率,检测器的分辨率,噪声和效率低下的增加,模式识别在计算上变得更具挑战性,激发了更高效率算法和技术的发展。量子关联记忆是一种方法,旨在利用量子机械现象以获得学习能力的优势,或者可以准确召集的模式数量。在这里,我们研究基于量子退火的量子关联记忆,并将其应用于粒子轨道分类。我们专注于基于量子关联记忆模型(QAMM)召回和量子内容 - 可调地理内存(QCAM)召回的歧视模型。我们使用D-Wave 2000Q处理器作为测试台将这些方法的分类性能表征为函数检测器分辨率,模式库大小和效率低下的效率低下。使用解决方案状态嵌入的溶液状态能量和分类标签设置歧视标准。我们发现,基于能量的QAMM分类在较小的模式密度和低探测器效率低下的状态下表现良好。相比之下,基于州的QCAM可以达到相当高的精度回忆,以实现大图密度的恢复,并且对各种检测器噪声源具有最大的回忆精度鲁棒性。
Pattern recognition algorithms are commonly employed to simplify the challenging and necessary step of track reconstruction in sub-atomic physics experiments. Aiding in the discrimination of relevant interactions, pattern recognition seeks to accelerate track reconstruction by isolating signals of interest. In high collision rate experiments, such algorithms can be particularly crucial for determining whether to retain or discard information from a given interaction even before the data is transferred to tape. As data rates, detector resolution, noise, and inefficiencies increase, pattern recognition becomes more computationally challenging, motivating the development of higher efficiency algorithms and techniques. Quantum associative memory is an approach that seeks to exploits quantum mechanical phenomena to gain advantage in learning capacity, or the number of patterns that can be stored and accurately recalled. Here, we study quantum associative memory based on quantum annealing and apply it to the particle track classification. We focus on discrimination models based on Ising formulations of quantum associative memory model (QAMM) recall and quantum content-addressable memory (QCAM) recall. We characterize classification performance of these approaches as a function detector resolution, pattern library size, and detector inefficiencies, using the D-Wave 2000Q processor as a testbed. Discrimination criteria is set using both solution-state energy and classification labels embedded in solution states. We find that energy-based QAMM classification performs well in regimes of small pattern density and low detector inefficiency. In contrast, state-based QCAM achieves reasonably high accuracy recall for large pattern density and the greatest recall accuracy robustness to a variety of detector noise sources.