论文标题

社会多样性和大流行的传播:来自印度的证据

Social Diversity and Spread of Pandemic: Evidence from India

论文作者

Das, Upasak, Rathore, Udayan, Sarkhel, Prasenjit

论文摘要

遵守大流行期间的公共卫生指南需要协调的社区行动,这可能会在社会多元化的地区受到破坏。在本文中,我们评估了印度在全国范围内的封锁和解锁时期,种姓群体多样性与Covid-19感染的传播之间的关系。在广泛的边际上,我们发现种姓同质的地区有系统地花费了更多天的时间来越过50至500例案例的浓度阈值。使用日常案例,对密集余量的估计进一步表明,种姓均匀的地区的感染增长较慢。总体而言,在锁定开始后,种姓群体均匀性的影响在2.5个月(约76天)中保持正面和统计学意义,并随后锁定阶段而削弱。即使在锁定之前的初始热点出现后,结果也得以成立,通过每日固定效应,固定效应和动态行政响应,通过时间变化的滞后covid-19,在地区一级的死亡中进行了更广泛的扩散模式。在某些州的测试和案件不足的测试水平差异水平并没有发现这些效果。偏置调整后的治疗效果的一致估计也确保我们的发现即使考虑到其他无法观察到的东西后,我们的发现仍然坚固。我们发现社区卫生工作者参与种姓家庭源地位的暗示性证据,在封锁后进一步增加了。我们认为这是一个可以解释我们结果的潜在渠道。我们的发现表明,如何使用种姓群体多样性来确定公共卫生紧急情况下潜在的热点,并强调社区卫生工作者的重要性和分散的政策反应。

Compliance with the public health guidelines during a pandemic requires coordinated community actions which might be undermined in socially diverse areas. In this paper, we assess the relationship between caste-group diversity and the spread of COVID-19 infection during the nationwide lockdown and unlocking period in India. On the extensive margin, we find that caste-homogeneous districts systematically took more days to cross the concentration thresholds of 50 to 500 cases. Estimates on the intensive margin, using daily cases, further show that caste-homogeneous districts experienced slower growth in infection. Overall, the effects of caste-group homogeneity remained positive and statistically significant for 2.5 months (about 76 days) after the beginning of the lockdown and weakened with subsequent phases of the lockdown. The results hold even after accounting for the emergence of initial hotspots before lockdown, broader diffusion patterns through daily fixed effects, region fixed effects, and dynamic administrative response through time-variant lagged COVID-19 fatalities at the district level. These effects are not found to be confounded by differential levels of testing and underreporting of cases in some states. Consistent estimates from bias-adjusted treatment effects also ensure that our findings remain robust even after accounting for other unobservables. We find suggestive evidence of higher engagement of community health workers in caste-homogenous localities, which further increased after the lockdown. We posit this as one potential channel that can explain our results. Our findings reveal how caste-group diversity can be used to identify potential hotspots during public health emergencies and emphasize the importance of community health workers and decentralized policy response.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源