论文标题

关于灰色文献的使用:巴西软件工程研究社区的调查

On the Use of Grey Literature: A Survey with the Brazilian Software Engineering Research Community

论文作者

Kamei, Fernando, Wiese, Igor, Pinto, Gustavo, Ribeiro, Márcio, Soares, Sérgio

论文摘要

背景:在不同的研究领域进行了调查的灰色文献(GL)。在软件工程(SE)中,该主题在过去几年中越来越兴趣。问题:即使在不同来源中发表了GL的增加,对他们在SE研究社区中使用的理解仍然存在争议。目的:了解巴西SE研究人员如何使用GL,我们旨在了解评估其使用信誉的标准以及收益和挑战。方法:我们调查了在巴西举行的旗舰SE会议的76名活跃的SE研究人员,使用了一份调查表,其中包含11个问题,分享了他们在SE研究背景下使用GL的看法。我们遵循一种定性方法来分析开放问题。结果:我们发现大多数受调查的研究人员主要使用GL来了解新主题。我们的工作确定了新发现,包括:1)SE研究人员使用的GL来源(例如,博客,社区网站); 2)使用的动机(例如,了解问题并补充研究结果)或避免GL的原因(例如,缺乏可靠性,缺乏科学价值); 3)易于访问和阅读GL的好处以及GL的挑战以其科学价值认可; 4)评估GL信誉的标准,表明内容所有者的重要性(例如,著名的作者和机构)。结论:我们的发现有助于通过讨论小说(一些矛盾的)结果,并为SE研究人员和从业者提供一系列经验教训,从而构成了SE研究人员使用GL的知识体系。

Background: The use of Grey Literature (GL) has been investigate in diverse research areas. In Software Engineering (SE), this topic has an increasing interest over the last years. Problem: Even with the increase of GL published in diverse sources, the understanding of their use on the SE research community is still controversial. Objective: To understand how Brazilian SE researchers use GL, we aimed to become aware of the criteria to assess the credibility of their use, as well as the benefits and challenges. Method: We surveyed 76 active SE researchers participants of a flagship SE conference in Brazil, using a questionnaire with 11 questions to share their views on the use of GL in the context of SE research. We followed a qualitative approach to analyze open questions. Results: We found that most surveyed researchers use GL mainly to understand new topics. Our work identified new findings, including: 1) GL sources used by SE researchers (e.g., blogs, community website); 2) motivations to use (e.g., to understand problems and to complement research findings) or reasons to avoid GL (e.g., lack of reliability, lack of scientific value); 3) the benefit that is easy to access and read GL and the challenge of GL to have its scientific value recognized; and 4) criteria to assess GL credibility, showing the importance of the content owner to be renowned (e.g., renowned author and institutions). Conclusions: Our findings contribute to form a body of knowledge on the use of GL by SE researchers, by discussing novel (some contradictory) results and providing a set of lessons learned to both SE researchers and practitioners.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源