论文标题
Zwicky瞬态设施的初步估计
Preliminary estimates of the Zwicky Transient Facility 'Ayló'chaxnim asteroid population completeness
论文作者
论文摘要
接近地球的小行星(NEAS)分为五个主要类别:Amor,Apollo,Aten,Atira和Ayló'chaxnim。属于“ayló'chaxnim类别的小行星完全位于维纳斯的轨道内,使它们难以通过地面观测值检测。 Zwicky Transient设施(ZTF)在2020年1月在暮光之城搜索小型太阳能伸长率的小行星中发现了这一班级的第一个众所周知的小行星,(594913)'ayló'chaxnim,是在2019年9月至2020年9月至1月在2020年9月之间运行的小型太阳能伸长率的,由于其$ 2 km的大型直径。 'ayló'chaxnim令人惊讶,因为当代的NEA人口模型预测了位于金星轨道内这种大小的小行星的稀缺性。为了比较ZTF(594913)'ayló'chaxnim与NEA人口模型的预测,我们估计了检测到“ayló'chaxnim小行星的ZTF调查完整性”,以及预期的'ayló'chaxnim小行星的数量,预计已通过模拟观察'Aiim'Aim'Aim'Aiim'aiim'aim'我们发现,调查的“ayló'chaxnim人口完整性为$ \ sim $ 18 $ \%$,只有一个5 $ \%$的概率可以发现单个'ayló'chaxnim小行星。考虑到(594913)'ayló'chaxnim被发现的机会很小,它的存在是统计氟,或者意味着小行星种群模型可能需要修改。
Near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) are organized into five main classes: Amor, Apollo, Aten, Atira and 'Ayló'chaxnim. Asteroids belonging to the 'Ayló'chaxnim class are located entirely within the orbit of Venus making them difficult to detect by ground-based observatories. The first-known asteroid of this class, (594913) 'Ayló'chaxnim, was discovered by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) in 2020 January during a twilight search for asteroids at small solar elongations that ran between September 2019 and January 2020. Due to its large diameter of $\sim$2 km, the discovery of (594913) 'Ayló'chaxnim is surprising because contemporary NEA population models predict a scarcity of asteroids of this size located inside the orbit of Venus. To compare the discovery of (594913) 'Ayló'chaxnim by ZTF with the predictions of NEA population models, we estimated the ZTF survey completeness at detecting 'Ayló'chaxnim asteroids and the number of 'Ayló'chaxnim asteroids expected to have been discovered by simulating observations of synthetic 'Ayló'chaxnim asteroids. We find that the 'Ayló'chaxnim population completeness of the survey is $\sim$18$\%$ and there is only a 5$\%$ probability that a single 'Ayló'chaxnim asteroid would have been discovered. Given the small chance for (594913) 'Ayló'chaxnim to have been discovered, its presence is either a statistical fluke or it implies that asteroid population models may need to be revised.