论文标题
拥挤的城市网络往往对信号设置不敏感:对基于学习的控制的影响
Congested Urban Networks Tend to Be Insensitive to Signal Settings: Implications for Learning-Based Control
论文作者
论文摘要
本文重点介绍了大型城市网络的几个属性,这些属性可能会影响应用于流量信号控制的机器学习方法。特别是,我们表明,随着密度的增加,平均网络流往往独立于信号控制策略。到目前为止,这种属性一直存在于雷达之下,这意味着在拥挤的条件下训练时,深度加强学习(DRL)方法变得无效,并且可能解释了DRL在交通信号控制方面的成功有限。我们的结果适用于所有可能的网格网络,这要归功于基于两个网络参数的参数化:连续交通信号灯与预期绿色时间之间的预期距离和交叉点的转弯概率的比率。具有不同参数的网络对流量信号控制的响应非常不同。值得注意的是,我们发现没有控制(即随机政策)可以成为一个令人惊讶的大型网络家庭的有效控制策略。对于基线和DRL策略,转向概率的影响都非常重要。它还解释了这些策略观察到的对称性的丧失,这并不能被依赖走廊近似没有转弯的现有理论所捕获。我们的发现还表明,监督的学习方法具有巨大的潜力,因为它们几乎不需要实例来制定出色的政策。
This paper highlights several properties of large urban networks that can have an impact on machine learning methods applied to traffic signal control. In particular, we show that the average network flow tends to be independent of the signal control policy as density increases. This property, which so far has remained under the radar, implies that deep reinforcement learning (DRL) methods becomes ineffective when trained under congested conditions, and might explain DRL's limited success for traffic signal control. Our results apply to all possible grid networks thanks to a parametrization based on two network parameters: the ratio of the expected distance between consecutive traffic lights to the expected green time, and the turning probability at intersections. Networks with different parameters exhibit very different responses to traffic signal control. Notably, we found that no control (i.e. random policy) can be an effective control strategy for a surprisingly large family of networks. The impact of the turning probability turned out to be very significant both for baseline and for DRL policies. It also explains the loss of symmetry observed for these policies, which is not captured by existing theories that rely on corridor approximations without turns. Our findings also suggest that supervised learning methods have enormous potential as they require very little examples to produce excellent policies.