论文标题

比较手动联系跟踪和数字联系建议

Comparing manual contact tracing and digital contact advice

论文作者

Raskar, Ramesh, Dhillon, Ranu, Kapa, Suraj, Pahwa, Deepti, Falgas, Renaud, Sinha, Lagnojita, Prasad, Aarathi, Singh, Abhishek, Nuzzo, Andrea, Iyer, Rohan, Sharma, Vivek

论文摘要

手动联系跟踪是一种自上而下的解决方案,从公共卫生层面的接触示踪剂开始,他们识别受感染者的联系,采访他们以获取有关暴露的其他背景,并监控其症状并支持它们,直到孵化期通过。另一方面,数字接触跟踪是一种自下而上的解决方案,该解决方案始于公民,他们在获得可能接触受感染者的通知时可能会选择忽略通知,进行测试以确定他们在接下来的两周内实际暴露或自我隔离并监测其症状。大多数专家建议将手动联系人跟踪和数字联系建议组合在一起,但不是基于科学的。例如,可能的混合动力解决方案可能涉及基于智能手机的警报,该警报要求受感染者可能接触下一步的公共卫生(PH)号码,或者在某些情况下,提出了自我评估的方法,以减轻pH值的负担,因此只有大多数关键案例需要电话交谈。在本文中,我们旨在比较与跟踪联系的手动和数字方法,并为潜在混合解决方案提供建议。

Manual contact tracing is a top-down solution that starts with contact tracers at the public health level, who identify the contacts of infected individuals, interview them to get additional context about the exposure, and also monitor their symptoms and support them until the incubation period is passed. On the other hand, digital contact tracing is a bottom-up solution that starts with citizens who on obtaining a notification about possible exposure to an infected individual may choose to ignore the notification, get tested to determine if they were actually exposed or self-isolate and monitor their symptoms over the next two weeks. Most experts recommend a combination of manual contact tracing and digital contact advice but they are not based on a scientific basis. For example, a possible hybrid solution could involve a smartphone based alert that requests the possible contact of an infected individual to call the Public Health (PH) number for next steps, or in some cases, suggest ways to self-assess in order to reduce the burden on PH so only most critical cases require a phone conversation. In this paper, we aim to compare the manual and digital approaches to contact tracing and provide suggestions for potential hybrid solutions.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源