论文标题
智能家居设备是否放弃IPV受害者?
Are Smart Home Devices Abandoning IPV Victims?
论文作者
论文摘要
智能家居设备为我们带来了许多好处,例如高级安全,便利性和娱乐。但是,这些设备也产生了意想不到的后果,例如为设备的所有者提供最终的权力,而在同一家庭中的亲密伙伴中,这可能会导致技术实现的家庭虐待(技术滥用),正如最近的研究所表明的那样。在本文中,我们将有关智能家居技术滥用的发现系统化。我们表明,智能家居中的家庭虐待和亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)对虐待者更有效,风险较小。受害者发现保护自己免受保护更加有害和更具挑战性。我们阐明了对智能家居中滥用的所有阶段的全面分析,并在每个阶段对风险和需求进行分类。进行当前智能家庭技术的技术分析是为了揭示其局限性。我们还总结了最新的建议,以打击智能家居中的技术滥用,并专注于它们的潜力和缺点。毫不奇怪,我们发现由于对智能家居中虐待的阶段缺乏了解,许多建议相互冲突。为设计耐虐待的智能家居设备设计的理想特性针对滥用的所有阶段提议。研究社区从我们的分析和建议中受益,以继续前进,重点是填补现有智能家居设备的安全措施的盲点,并建立适当的安全措施,以考虑智能家居中的技术滥用威胁。
Smart home devices have brought us many benefits such as advanced security, convenience, and entertainment. However, these devices also have made unintended consequences like giving ultimate power for devices' owners over their intimate partners in the same household which might lead to tech-facilitated domestic abuse (tech-abuse) as recent research has shown. In this paper, we systematize findings on tech-abuse in smart homes. We show that domestic abuse and Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in smart homes is more effective and less risky for abusers. Victims find it more harmful and more challenging to protect themselves from. We articulate a comprehensive analysis of all the phases of abuse in smart homes and categorize risks and needs in each phase. Technical analysis of current smart home technologies is conducted to shed light upon their limitations. We also summarize recent recommendations to combat tech-abuse in smart homes and focus on their potentials and shortcomings. Unsurprisingly, we find that many recommendations conflict with each other due to a lack of understanding of phases of abuse in smart homes. Desirable properties to design abuse-resistant smart home devices are proposed for all the phases of abuse. The research community benefits from our analysis and recommendations to move forward with a focus on filling the blind spots of existing smart home devices' safety measures and building appropriate safety measures that consider tech-abuse threats in smart homes.