论文标题
评论“勘误：$^{135} _ {59} $ pr $ _ {76} $ [Phys。Cev。C 92，054325（2015）]中的$^{135} _ {59} _ {59} _ {59} _ {59} _ {59} _ {59} _ {135} _ {135} _ {135} _ {135} _ {135} _ {135} _ {135} _ {135} _ {135} _ {135}中可能的磁旋转频段的评论评论
Comment on "Erratum: Negative-parity high-spin states and a possible magnetic rotation band in $^{135}_{59}$Pr$_{76}$ [Phys. Rev. C 92, 054325 (2015)]"
论文作者
论文摘要
在[Ritika Garg等人，物理学。 Rev. C 100，069901（E）（2019）]由于声称几何形状不对称的变化而对极化不对称的实验结果进行了修订。但是，通过简单地更改几何形状不对称性在提取极化不对称的情况下，无法重新提取原始实验数据中的极化不对称，因此无法通过简单地更改几何形状不对称来复制修订后的结果。引用的错误可能被显着低估。
In [Ritika Garg et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 069901(E) (2019)] the experimental results on the polarization asysmetry were revised due to a claimed change of the geometry asymmetry. However, the revised results can not be reproduced as claimed in the erratum by simply changing the geometry asymmetry in extracting the polarization asymmetry, without re-extracting the polarization asymmetry from the original experimental data. It is possible that the quoted errors were significantly underestimated.
